按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
… Page 21…
On the Improvement of the Understanding
we stated to be the result of simultaneously directing the attention； without
the assent of the intellect； to different confused ideas representing different
things and actions existing in nature； we have seen that an absolutely
simple thing cannot be feigned； but must be understood； and that a
complex thing is in the same case if we regard separately the simple parts
whereof it is composed； we shall not even be able to hypothesize any
untrue action concerning such objects； for we shall be obliged to consider
at the same time the causes and manner of such action。
＇66＇ （1） These matters being thus understood； let us pass on to
consider the false idea； observing the objects with which it is concerned；
and the means of guarding ourselves from falling into false perceptions。
（2） Neither of these tasks will present much difficulty； after our inquiry
concerning fictitious ideas。 （3） The false idea only differs from the
fictitious idea in the fact of implying a mental assent … that is； as we have
already remarked； while the representations are occurring； there are no
causes present to us； wherefrom； as in fiction； we can conclude that such
representations do not arise from external objects： in fact； it is much the
same as dreaming with our eyes open； or while awake。 （67：4） Thus； a
false idea is concerned with； or （to speak more correctly） is attributable to；
the existence of a thing whereof the essence is known； or the essence itself；
in the same way as a fictitious idea。
＇67＇ （1） If attributable to the existence of the thing； it is corrected in
the same way as a fictitious idea under similar circumstances。 （2） If
attributable to the essence； it is likewise corrected in the same way as a
fictitious idea。 （67：3） For if the nature of the thing known implies
necessary existence； we cannot possible be in error with regard to its
existence； but if the nature of the thing be not an eternal truth； like its
essence； but contrariwise the necessity or impossibility of its existence
depends on external causes； then we must follow the same course as we
adopted in the of fiction； for it is corrected in the same manner。
＇68＇ （1） As for false ideas concerned with essences； or even with
actions； such perceptions are necessarily always confused； being
compounded of different confused perceptions of things existing in nature；
as； for instance； when men are persuaded that deities are present in woods；
21
… Page 22…
On the Improvement of the Understanding
in statues； in brute beasts； and the like； that there are bodies which； by
their composition alone； give rise to intellect； that corpses reason； walk
about； and speak； that God is deceived； and so on。 （68：2） But ideas
which are clear and distinct can never be false： for ideas of things clearly
and distinctly conceived are either very simple themselves； or are
compounded from very simple ideas； that is； are deduced therefrom。 （3）
The impossibility of a very simple idea being false is evident to everyone
who understands the nature of truth or understanding and of falsehood。
＇69＇ （1） As regards that which constitutes the reality of truth； it is
certain that a true idea is distinguished from a false one； not so much by its
extrinsic object as by its intrinsic nature。 （2） If an architect conceives a
building properly constructed； though such a building may never have
existed； and amy never exist； nevertheless the idea is true； and the idea
remains the same； whether it be put into execution or not。 （69：3） On the
other hand； if anyone asserts； for instance； that Peter exists； without
knowing whether Peter really exists or not； the assertion； as far as its
asserter is concerned； is false； or not true； even though Peter actually does
exist。 （4） The assertion that Peter exists is true only with regard to him
who knows for certain that Peter does exist。
＇70＇ （1） Whence it follows that there is in ideas something real；
whereby the true are distinguished from the false。 （2） This reality must
be inquired into； if we are to find the best standard of truth （we have said
that we ought to determine our thoughts by the given standard of a true
idea； and that method is reflective knowledge）； and to know the properties
of our understanding。 （70：3） Neither must we say that the difference
between true and false arises from the fact； that true knowledge consists in
knowing things through their primary causes； wherein it is totally different
from false knowledge； as I have just explained it： for thought is said to be
true； if it involves subjectively the essence of any principle which has no
cause； and is known through itself and in itself。
＇71＇ （1） Wherefore the reality （forma） of true thought must exist in
the thought itself； without reference to other thoughts； it does not
acknowledge the object as its cause； but must depend on the actual power
and nature of the understanding。 （2） For； if we suppose that the
22
… Page 23…
On the Improvement of the Understanding
understanding has perceived some new entity which has never existed； as
some conceive the understanding of God before He created thing （a
perception which certainly could not arise any object）； and has
legitimately deduced other thoughts from said perception； all such
thoughts would be true； without being determined by any external object；
they would depend solely on the power and nature of the understanding。
（71：3） Thus； that which constitutes the reality of a true thought must be
sought in the thought itself； and deduced from the nature of the
understanding。
＇72＇ （1） In order to pursue our investigation； let us confront
ourselves with some