友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
飞读中文网 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

three dialogues-第2章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



of sciences? But these you know are universal intellectual
notions; and consequently independent of Matter。 The denial
therefore of this doth not imply the denying them。

     。 I grant it。 But are there no other things? What think
you of distrusting the senses; of denying the real existence of
sensible things; or pretending to know nothing of them。 Is not
this sufficient to denominate a man a ?

     。 Shall we therefore examine which of us it is that
denies the reality of sensible things; or professes the greatest
ignorance of them; since; if I take you rightly; he is to be
{174} esteemed the greatest ?

     。 That is what I desire。

     。 What mean you by Sensible Things?

     。 Those things which are perceived by the senses。 Can
you imagine that I mean anything else?

     。 Pardon me; Hylas; if I am desirous clearly to
apprehend your notions; since this may much shorten our inquiry。
Suffer me then to ask you this farther question。 Are those things
only perceived by the senses which are perceived immediately? Or;
may those things properly be said to be  which are
perceived mediately; or not without the intervention of others?

     。 I do not sufficiently understand you。

     。 In reading a book; what I immediately perceive are
the letters; but mediately; or by means of these; are suggested
to my mind the notions of God; virtue; truth; &c。 Now; that the
letters are truly sensible things; or perceived by sense; there
is no doubt: but I would know whether you take the things
suggested by them to be so too。

     。 No; certainly: it were absurd to think  or
 sensible things; though they may be signified and
suggested to the mind by sensible marks; with which they have an
arbitrary connexion。

     。 It seems then; that by  you mean
those only which can be perceived  by sense?

     。 Right。

     。 Doth it not follow from this; that though I see one
part of the sky red; and another blue; and that my reason doth
thence evidently conclude there must be some cause of that
diversity of colours; yet that cause cannot be said to be a
sensible thing; or perceived by the sense of seeing?

     。 It doth。

     。 In like manner; though I hear variety of sounds; yet
I cannot be said to hear the causes of those sounds?

     。 You cannot。

     。 And when by my touch I perceive a thing to be hot
and heavy; I cannot say; with any truth or propriety; that I feel
the cause of its heat or weight?

     。 To prevent any more questions of this kind; I tell
you once for all; that by  I mean those only
which are perceived by sense; and that in truth the senses
perceive nothing which they do not perceive : for
they make no {175} inferences。 The deducing therefore of causes
or occasions from effects and appearances; which alone are
perceived by sense; entirely relates to reason。

     。 This point then is agreed between us  That
。 You will farther inform me; whether we immediately
perceive by sight anything beside light; and colours; and
figures; or by hearing; anything but sounds; by the palate;
anything beside tastes; by the smell; beside odours; or by the
touch; more than tangible qualities。

     。 We do not。

     。 It seems; therefore; that if you take away all
sensible qualities; there remains nothing sensible?

     。 I grant it。

     。 Sensible things therefore are {250} nothing else but
so many sensible qualities; or combinations of sensible
qualities?

     。 Nothing else。

     。  then is a sensible thing?

     。 Certainly。

     。 Doth the  of sensible things consist in
being perceived? or; is it something distinct from their being
perceived; and that bears no relation to the mind?

     。 To  is one thing; and to be  is
another。

     。 I speak with regard to sensible things only。 And of
these I ask; whether by their real existence you mean a
subsistence exterior to the mind; and distinct from their being
perceived?

     。 I mean a real absolute being; distinct from; and
without any relation to; their being perceived。

     。 Heat therefore; if it be allowed a real being; must
exist without the mind?

     。 It must。

     。 Tell me; Hylas; is this real existence equally
compatible to all degrees of heat; which we perceive; or is there
any reason why we should attribute it to some; and deny it to
others? And if there be; pray let me know that reason。

     。 Whatever degree of heat we perceive by sense; we may
be sure the same exists in the object that occasions it。

     。 What! the greatest as well as the least?

     。  tell you; the reason is plainly the same in
respect of both。 They are both perceived by sense; nay; the
greater degree of heat is more sensibly perceived; and
consequently; if there is {176} any difference; we are more
certain of its real existence than we can be of the reality of a
lesser degree。

     。 But is not the most vehement and intense degree of
heat a very great pain?

     。 No one can deny it。

     。 And is any unperceiving thing capable of pain or
pleasure?

     。 No; certainly。

     。 Is your material substance a senseless being; or a
being endowed with sense and perception?

     。 It is senseless without doubt。

     。 It cannot therefore be the subject of pain?

     。 By no means。

     。 Nor consequently of the greatest heat perceived by
sense; since you acknowledge this to be no small pain?

     。 I grant it。

     。 What shall we say then of your external object; is
it a material Substance; or no?

     。 It is a material substance with the sensible
qualities inhering in it。

     。 How then can a great heat exist in it; since you own
it cannot in a material substance? I desire you would clear this
point。

     。 Hold; Philonous; I fear I was out in yielding intense
heat to be a pain。 It should seem rather; that pain is something
distinct from heat; and the consequence or effect of it。

     。 Upon putting your hand near the fire; do you
perceive one simple uniform sensation; or two distinct
sensations?

     。 But one simple sensation。

     。 Is not the heat immediately perceived?;

     。 It is。

     。 And the pain?

     。 True。

     。 Seeing therefore they are both immediately perceived
at the same time; and the fire affects you only with one simple
or uncompounded idea; it follows that this same simple idea is
both the intense heat immediately perceived; and the pain; and;
consequently; that the intense heat immediately perceived is
nothing distinct from a particular sort of pain。

     。 It seems so。

     。 Again; try in your thoughts; Hylas; if you can
conceive a 
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!