按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
agements be observed in their genuine sense； but in my opinion it is unnecessary； and would be unwise； to extend them。 Taking care always to keep ourselves； by suitable establishments； in a respectable defensive posture； we may safely trust to temporary alliances for extraordinary emergencies。〃 In a previous part of the same letter Washington makes the following admirable and just remark： 〃The nation which indulges towards another an habitual hatred or an habitual fondness is in some degree a slave。 It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection； either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interest。〃
The political conduct of Washington was always guided by these maxims。 He succeeded in maintaining his country in a state of peace whilst all the other nations of the globe were at war； and he laid it down as a fundamental doctrine； that the true interest of the Americans consisted in a perfect neutrality with regard to the internal dissensions of the European Powers。
Jefferson went still further； and he introduced a maxim into the policy of the Union； which affirms that 〃the Americans ought never to solicit any privileges from foreign nations； in order not to be obliged to grant similar privileges themselves。〃
These two principles； which were so plain and so just as to be adapted to the capacity of the populace； have greatly simplified the foreign policy of the United States。 As the Union takes no part in the affairs of Europe； it has； properly speaking； no foreign interests to discuss； since it has at present no powerful neighbors on the American continent。 The country is as much removed from the passions of the Old World by its position as by the line of policy which it has chosen； and it is neither called upon to repudiate nor to espouse the conflicting interests of Europe； whilst the dissensions of the New World are still concealed within the bosom of the future。
The Union is free from all pre…existing obligations； and it is consequently enabled to profit by the experience of the old nations of Europe； without being obliged； as they are； to make the best of the past； and to adapt it to their present circumstances； or to accept that immense inheritance which they derive from their forefathers … an inheritance of glory mingled with calamities； and of alliances conflicting with national antipathies。 The foreign policy of the United States is reduced by its very nature to await the chances of the future history of the nation； and for the present it consists more in abstaining from interference than in exerting its activity。
It is therefore very difficult to ascertain； at present； what degree of sagacity the American democracy will display in the conduct of the foreign policy of the country； and upon this point its adversaries； as well as its advocates； must suspend their judgment。 As for myself I have no hesitation in avowing my conviction； that it is most especially in the conduct of foreign relations that democratic governments appear to me to be decidedly inferior to governments carried on upon different principles。 Experience； instruction； and habit may almost always succeed in creating a species of practical discretion in democracies； and that science of the daily occurrences of life which is called good sense。 Good sense may suffice to direct the ordinary course of society； and amongst a people whose education has been provided for； the advantages of democratic liberty in the internal affairs of the country may more than compensate for the evils inherent in a democratic government。 But such is not always the case in the mutual relations of foreign nations。
Foreign politics demand scarcely any of those qualities which a democracy possesses； and they require； on the contrary； the perfect use of almost all those faculties in which it is deficient。 Democracy is favorable to the increase of the internal resources of the State； it tends to diffuse a moderate independence； it promotes the growth of public spirit； and fortifies the respect which is entertained for law in all classes of society； and these are advantages which only exercise an indirect influence over the relations which one people bears to another。 But a democracy is unable to regulate the details of an important undertaking； to persevere in a design； and to work out its execution in the presence of serious obstacles。 It cannot combine its measures with secrecy； and it will not await their consequences with patience。 These are qualities which more especially belong to an individual or to an aristocracy； and they are precisely the means by which an individual people attains to a predominant position。
If； on the contrary； we observe the natural defects of aristocracy； we shall find that their influence is comparatively innoxious in the direction of the external affairs of a State。 The capital fault of which aristocratic bodies may be accused is that they are more apt to contrive their own advantage than that of the mass of the people。 In foreign politics it is rare for the interest of the aristocracy to be in any way distinct from that of the people。
The propensity which democracies have to obey the impulse of passion rather than the suggestions of prudence； and to abandon a mature design for the gratification of a momentary caprice； was very clearly seen in America on the breaking out of the French Revolution。 It was then as evident to the simplest capacity as it is at the present time that the interest of the Americans forbade them to take any part in the contest which was about to deluge Europe with blood； but which could by no means injure the welfare of their own country。 Nevertheless the sympathies of the people declared themselves with so much violence in behalf of France that nothing but the inflexible character of Washington； and the immense popularity which he enjoyed； could have prevented the Americans from declaring war against England。 And even then； the exertions which the austere reason of that great man made to repress the generous but imprudent passions of his fellow…citizens； very nearly deprived him of the sole recompense which he had ever claimed … that of his country's love。 The majority then reprobated the line of policy which he adopted； and which has since been unanimously approved by the nation。 *s If the Constitution and the favor of the public had not entrusted the direction of the foreign affairs of the country to Washington； it is certain that the American nation would at that time have taken the very measures which it now condemns。
＇Footnote s： See the fifth volume of Marshall's 〃Life of Washington。〃 In a government constituted like that of the United States；〃 he says； 〃it is impossible for the chief magistrate； however firm he may be； to oppose for any length of time the torrent of popular opinion； and the prevalent opinion of that day seemed to incline to war。 In fact； in the session of Congress held at the time； it was frequently seen that Washington had lost the majority in the House of Representatives。〃 The violence of the language used against him in public was extreme； and in a political meeting they did not scruple to compare him indirectly to the treacherous A