按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
hich a people is longest in learning how to exercise。 If it does not throw the nation into anarchy； it perpetually augments the chances of that calamity。 On one point； however； this perilous liberty offers a security against dangers of another kind； in countries where associations are free； secret societies are unknown。 In America there are numerous factions； but no conspiracies。
Different ways in which the right of association is understood in Europeand in the United States … Different use which is made of it。
The most natural privilege of man； next to the right of acting for himself； is that of combining his exertions with those
of his fellow…creatures； and of acting in common with them。 I am therefore led to conclude that the right of association is almost as inalienable as the right of personal liberty。 No legislator can attack it without impairing the very foundations of society。 Nevertheless； if the liberty of association is a fruitful source of advantages and prosperity to some nations； it may be perverted or carried to excess by others； and the element of life may be changed into an element of destruction。 A comparison of the different methods which associations pursue in those countries in which they are managed with discretion； as well as in those where liberty degenerates into license； may perhaps be thought useful both to governments and to parties。
The greater part of Europeans look upon an association as a weapon which is to be hastily fashioned； and immediately tried in the conflict。 A society is formed for discussion； but the idea of impending action prevails in the minds of those who constitute it： it is； in fact； an army； and the time given to parley serves to reckon up the strength and to animate the courage of the host； after which they direct their march against the enemy。 Resources which lie within the bounds of the law may suggest themselves to the persons who compose it as means； but never as the only means； of success。
Such； however； is not the manner in which the right of association is understood in the United States。 In America the citizens who form the minority associate； in order； in the first place； to show their numerical strength； and so to diminish the moral authority of the majority； and； in the second place； to stimulate competition； and to discover those arguments which are most fitted to act upon the majority； for they always entertain hopes of drawing over their opponents to their own side； and of afterwards disposing of the supreme power in their name。 Political associations in the United States are therefore peaceable in their intentions； and strictly legal in the means which they employ； and they assert with perfect truth that they only aim at success by lawful expedients。
The difference which exists between the Americans and ourselves depends on several causes。 In Europe there are numerous parties so diametrically opposed to the majority that they can never hope to acquire its support； and at the same time they think that they are sufficiently strong in themselves to struggle and to defend their cause。 When a party of this kind forms an association； its object is； not to conquer； but to fight。 In America the individuals who hold opinions very much opposed to those of the majority are no sort of impediment to its power； and all other parties hope to win it over to their own principles in the end。 The exercise of the right of association becomes dangerous in proportion to the impossibility which excludes great parties from acquiring the majority。 In a country like the United States； in which the differences of opinion are mere differences of hue； the right of association may remain unrestrained without evil consequences。 The inexperience of many of the European nations in the enjoyment of liberty leads them only to look upon the liberty of association as a right of attacking the Government。 The first notion which presents itself to a party； as well as to an individual； when it has acquired a consciousness of its own strength； is that of violence： the notion of persuasion arises at a later period and is only derived from experience。 The English； who are divided into parties which differ most essentially from each other； rarely abuse the right of association； because they have long been accustomed to exercise it。 In France the passion for war is so intense that there is no undertaking so mad； or so injurious to the welfare of the State； that a man does not consider himself honored in defending it； at the risk of his life。
But perhaps the most powerful of the causes which tend to mitigate the excesses of political association in the United States is Universal Suffrage。 In countries in which universal suffrage exists the majority is never doubtful； because neither party can pretend to represent that portion of the community which has not voted。 The associations which are formed are aware； as well as the nation at large； that they do not represent the majority： this is； indeed； a condition inseparable from their existence； for if they did represent the preponderating power； they would change the law instead of soliciting its reform。 The consequence of this is that the moral influence of the Government which they attack is very much increased； and their own power is very much enfeebled。
In Europe there are few associations which do not affect to represent the majority； or which do not believe that they represent it。 This conviction or this pretension tends to augment their force amazingly； and contributes no less to legalize their measures。 Violence may seem to be excusable in defence of the cause of oppressed right。 Thus it is； in the vast labyrinth of human laws； that extreme liberty sometimes corrects the abuses of license； and that extreme democracy obviates the dangers of democratic government。 In Europe； associations consider themselves； in some degree； as the legislative and executive councils of the people； which is unable to speak for itself。 In America； where they only represent a minority of the nation； they argue and they petition。
The means which the associations of Europe employ are in accordance with the end which they propose to obtain。 As the principal aim of these bodies is to act； and not to debate； to fight rather than to persuade； they are naturally led to adopt a form of organization which differs from the ordinary customs of civil bodies； and which assumes the habits and the maxims of military life。 They centralize the direction of their resources as much as possible； and they intrust the power of the whole party to a very small number of leaders。
The members of these associations respond to a watchword； like soldiers on duty； they profess the doctrine of passive obedience； say rather； that in uniting together they at once abjure the exercise of their own judgment and free will； and the tyrannical control which these societies exercise is often far more insupportable than the authority possessed over society by the Government which they attack。 Their moral force is much diminished by these excesses； and they lose the powerful interest which is always excited by a struggle between oppressors and the oppressed。 The