友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
飞读中文网 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

democracy in america-1-第160章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



ake that road which he thinks will lead him to heaven; just as the law permits every citizen to have the right of choosing his government。

It is evident that nothing but a long series of events; all having the same tendency; can substitute for this combination of laws; opinions; and manners; a mass of opposite opinions; manners; and laws。

If republican principles are to perish in America; they can only yield after a laborious social process; often interrupted; and as often resumed; they will have many apparent revivals; and will not become totally extinct until an entirely new people shall have succeeded to that which now exists。 Now; it must be admitted that there is no symptom or presage of the approach of such a revolution。  There is nothing more striking to a person newly arrived in the United States; than the kind of tumultuous agitation in which he finds political society。  The laws are incessantly changing; and at first sight it seems impossible that a people so variable in its desires should avoid adopting; within a short space of time; a completely new form of government。  Such apprehensions are; however; premature; the instability which affects political institutions is of two kinds; which ought not to be confounded: the first; which modifies secondary laws; is not incompatible with a very settled state of society; the other shakes the very foundations of the Constitution; and attacks the fundamental principles of legislation; this species of instability is always followed by troubles and revolutions; and the nation which suffers under it is in a state of violent transition。

Experience shows that these two kinds of legislative instability have no necessary connection; for they have been found united or separate; according to times and circumstances。  The first is common in the United States; but not the second: the Americans often change their laws; but the foundation of the Constitution is respected。

In our days the republican principle rules in America; as the monarchical principle did in France under Louis XIV。  The French of that period were not only friends of the monarchy; but they thought it impossible to put anything in its place; they received it as we receive the rays of the sun and the return of the seasons。  Amongst them the royal power had neither advocates nor opponents。  In like manner does the republican government exist in America; without contention or opposition; without proofs and arguments; by a tacit agreement; a sort of consensus universalis。  It is; however; my opinion that by changing their administrative forms as often as they do; the inhabitants of the United States compromise the future stability of their government。

It may be apprehended that men; perpetually thwarted in their designs by the mutability of the legislation; will learn to look upon republican institutions as an inconvenient form of society; the evil resulting from the instability of the secondary enactments might then raise a doubt as to the nature of the fundamental principles of the Constitution; and indirectly bring about a revolution; but this epoch is still very remote。

It may; however; be foreseen even now; that when the Americans lose their republican institutions they will speedily arrive at a despotic government; without a long interval of limited monarchy。  Montesquieu remarked; that nothing is more absolute than the authority of a prince who immediately succeeds a republic; since the powers which had fearlessly been intrusted to an elected magistrate are then transferred to a hereditary sovereign。  This is true in general; but it is more peculiarly applicable to a democratic republic。  In the United States; the magistrates are not elected by a particular class of citizens; but by the majority of the nation; they are the immediate representatives of the passions of the multitude; and as they are wholly dependent upon its pleasure; they excite neither hatred nor fear: hence; as I have already shown; very little care has been taken to limit their influence; and they are left in possession of a vast deal of arbitrary power。 This state of things has engendered habits which would outlive itself; the American magistrate would retain his power; but he would cease to be responsible for the exercise of it; and it is impossible to say what bounds could then be set to tyranny。

Some of our European politicians expect to see an aristocracy arise in America; and they already predict the exact period at which it will be able to assume the reins of government。  I have previously observed; and I repeat my assertion; that the present tendency of American society appears to me to become more and more democratic。  Nevertheless; I do not assert that the Americans will not; at some future time; restrict the circle of political rights in their country; or confiscate those rights to the advantage of a single individual; but I cannot imagine that they will ever bestow the exclusive exercise of them upon a privileged class of citizens; or; in other words; that they will ever found an aristocracy。 

An aristocratic body is composed of a certain number of citizens who; without being very far removed from the mass of the people; are; nevertheless; permanently stationed above it: a body which it is easy to touch and difficult to strike; with which the people are in daily contact; but with which they can never combine。  Nothing can be imagined more contrary to nature and to the secret propensities of the human heart than a subjection of this kind; and men who are left to follow their own bent will always prefer the arbitrary power of a king to the regular administration of an aristocracy。  Aristocratic institutions cannot subsist without laying down the inequality of men as a fundamental principle; as a part and parcel of the legislation; affecting the condition of the human family as much as it affects that of society; but these are things so repugnant to natural equity that they can only be extorted from men by constraint。

I do not think a single people can be quoted; since human society began to exist; which has; by its own free will and by its own exertions; created an aristocracy within its own bosom。  All the aristocracies of the Middle Ages were founded by military conquest; the conqueror was the noble; the vanquished became the serf。  Inequality was then imposed by force; and after it had been introduced into the maners of the country it maintained its own authority; and was sanctioned by the legislation。  Communities have existed which were aristocratic from their earliest origin; owing to circumstances anterior to that event; and which became more democratic in each succeeding age。  Such was the destiny of the Romans; and of the barbarians after them。 But a people; having taken its rise in civilization and democracy; which should gradually establish an inequality of conditions; until it arrived at inviolable privileges and exclusive castes; would be a novelty in the world; and nothing intimates that America is likely to furnish so singular an example。

Reflection On The Causes Of The Commercial Prosperity Of The Of The United States

The Americans destined by Nature to be a great maritime people … Extent of th
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!