按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
eritance。 When the law of primogeniture obtained in the South； each family was represented by a wealthy individual； who was neither compelled nor induced to labor； and he was surrounded； as by parasitic plants； by the other members of his family who were then excluded by law from sharing the common inheritance； and who led the same kind of life as himself。 The very same thing then occurred in all the families of the South as still happens in the wealthy families of some countries in Europe； namely； that the younger sons remain in the same state of idleness as their elder brother； without being as rich as he is。 This identical result seems to be produced in Europe and in America by wholly analogous causes。 In the South of the United States the whole race of whites formed an aristocratic body； which was headed by a certain number of privileged individuals； whose wealth was permanent； and whose leisure was hereditary。 These leaders of the American nobility kept alive the traditional prejudices of the white race in the body of which they were the representatives； and maintained the honor of inactive life。 This aristocracy contained many who were poor； but none who would work； its members preferred want to labor； consequently no competition was set on foot against negro laborers and slaves； and； whatever opinion might be entertained as to the utility of their efforts； it was indispensable to employ them； since there was no one else to work。
No sooner was the law of primogeniture abolished than fortunes began to diminish； and all the families of the country were simultaneously reduced to a state in which labor became necessary to procure the means of subsistence： several of them have since entirely disappeared； and all of them learned to look forward to the time at which it would be necessary for everyone to provide for his own wants。 Wealthy individuals are still to be met with； but they no longer constitute a compact and hereditary body； nor have they been able to adopt a line of conduct in which they could persevere； and which they could infuse into all ranks of society。 The prejudice which stigmatized labor was in the first place abandoned by common consent； the number of needy men was increased； and the needy were allowed to gain a laborious subsistence without blushing for their exertions。 Thus one of the most immediate consequences of the partible quality of estates has been to create a class of free laborers。 As soon as a competition was set on foot between the free laborer and the slave； the inferiority of the latter became manifest； and slavery was attacked in its fundamental principle； which is the interest of the master。
As slavery recedes； the black population follows its retrograde course； and returns with it towards those tropical regions from which it originally came。 However singular this fact may at first appear to be； it may readily be explained。 Although the Americans abolish the principle of slavery； they do not set their slaves free。 To illustrate this remark； I will quote the example of the State of New York。 In 1788； the State of New York prohibited the sale of slaves within its limits； which was an indirect method of prohibiting the importation of blacks。 Thenceforward the number of negroes could only increase according to the ratio of the natural increase of population。 But eight years later a more decisive measure was taken； and it was enacted that all children born of slave parents after July 4； 1799； should be free。 No increase could then take place； and although slaves still existed； slavery might be said to be abolished。
From the time at which a Northern State prohibited the importation of slaves； no slaves were brought from the South to be sold in its markets。 On the other hand； as the sale of slaves was forbidden in that State； an owner was no longer able to get rid of his slave （who thus became a burdensome possession） otherwise than by transporting him to the South。 But when a Northern State declared that the son of the slave should be born free； the slave lost a large portion of his market value； since his posterity was no longer included in the bargain； and the owner had then a strong interest in transporting him to the South。 Thus the same law prevents the slaves of the South from coming to the Northern States； and drives those of the North to the South。
The want of free hands is felt in a State in proportion as the number of slaves decreases。 But in proportion as labor is performed by free hands； slave labor becomes less productive； and the slave is then a useless or onerous possession； whom it is important to export to those Southern States where the same competition is not to be feared。 Thus the abolition of slavery does not set the slave free； but it merely transfers him from one master to another； and from the North to the South。
The emancipated negroes； and those born after the abolition of slavery； do not； indeed； migrate from the North to the South； but their situation with regard to the Europeans is not unlike that of the aborigines of America； they remain half civilized； and deprived of their rights in the midst of a population which is far superior to them in wealth and in knowledge； where they are exposed to the tyranny of the laws *m and the intolerance of the people。 On some accounts they are still more to be pitied than the Indians； since they are haunted by the reminiscence of slavery； and they cannot claim possession of a single portion of the soil： many of them perish miserably； *n and the rest congregate in the great towns； where they perform the meanest offices； and lead a wretched and precarious existence。
＇Footnote m： The States in which slavery is abolished usually do what they can to render their territory disagreeable to the negroes as a place of residence； and as a kind of emulation exists between the different States in this respect； the unhappy blacks can only choose the least of the evils which beset them。＇
＇Footnote n： There is a very great difference between the mortality of the blacks and of the whites in the States in which slavery is abolished； from 1820 to 1831 only one out of forty…two individuals of the white population died in Philadelphia； but one negro out of twenty…one individuals of the black population died in the same space of time。 The mortality is by no means so great amongst the negroes who are still slaves。 （See Emmerson's 〃Medical Statistics；〃 p。 28。）＇
But even if the number of negroes continued to increase as rapidly as when they were still in a state of slavery； as the number of whites augments with twofold rapidity since the abolition of slavery； the blacks would soon be； as it were； lost in the midst of a strange population。
A district which is cultivated by slaves is in general more scantily peopled than a district cultivated by free labor： moreover； America is still a new country； and a State is therefore not half peopled at the time when it abolishes slavery。 No sooner is an end put to slavery than the want of free labor is felt； and a crowd of enterprising adventurers immediately arrive from all parts of the country； who hasten to profit by the fresh resources which are then opened to indust