some considerations of the lowering of interest-第18章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！


dities。　It　is　in　vain　in　a　Country　whose　great　Fund　is　Land；　to　hope　to　lay　the　publick　charge　of　the　Government　on　any　thing　else；　there　at　last　it　will　terminate。　The　Merchant　（do　what　you　can）　will　not　bear　it；　the　Labourer　cannot；　and　therefore　the　Landholder　must：　And　whether　he　were　best　do　it；　by　laying　it　directly；　where　it　will　at　last　settle；　or　by　letting　it　come　to　him　by　the　sinking　of　his　Rents；　which　when　they　are　once　fallen　every　one　knows　are　not　easily　raised　again；　let　him　consider。　　　　　Holland　is　brought　as　an　instance　of　laying　the　Charge　of　the　publique　upon　Trade；　and　'tis　possibly　（excepting　some　few　small　Free　Towns）　the　only　place　in　the　World　that　could　be　brought　to　favour　this　way。　But　yet　when　examin'd　will　be　found　to　shew　the　quite　contrary；　and　be　a　clear　Proof；　that　lay　the　Taxes　how　you　will；　Land　every　where；　in　proportion；　bears　the　greater　share　of　the　burthen。　The　publick　Charge　of　the　Government；　'tis　said；　is；　in　the　United　Provinces；　laid　on　Trade。　I　grant　it　is；　the　greatest　part　of　it；　But　is　the　Land　Excus'd　or　Eas'd　by　it？　By　no　means；　but　on　the　contrary　so　loaded；　that　in　many　places　half；　in　others　a　quarter；　in　others　one　eighth　of　the　Yearly　value　does　not　come　into　the　owners　Pocket：　And　if　I　have　not　been　misinformed；　the　Land　in　some　places　will　not　pay　the　Taxes：　So　that　we　may　say；　that　the　Charge　of　the　Government　came　not　upon　Commodities　till　the　Land　could　not　bear　it。　The　burthen　unavoidably　settles　upon　the　Land　first；　and　when　it　has　pressed　it　so；　that　it　can　yield　no　more；　Trade　must　be　brought　in　in　aid　to　help　to　support　the　Government　rather　than　let　all　sink：　But　the　first　stress　is　always　upon　Land；　and　as　far　as　that　will　reach；　it　is　unavoidably　carried；　lay　your　Taxes　how　you　will。　'Tis　known　what　a　share　of　the　publick　charges　of　the　Government　is　supported　by　the　Trade　of　Amsterdam　alone；　as　I　remember　that　one　Town　pays　Thirty…six　in　the　Hundred　of　all　the　publick　Taxes　raised　in　the　United　Provinces。　But　are　the　Lands　of　Guelderland　eas'd　by　it？　Let　any　one　see　in　that　Country　of　Land　more　than　Trade；　what　they　make　clear　of　their　Revenues；　and　whether　the　Country　Gentlemen　there　grow　rich　on　their　Land；　whilst　the　Merchant　having　the　Taxes　laid　on　his　Commerce　is　impoverish'd？　On　the　contrary　Guelderland　is　so　low　and　out　of　Cash；　that　Amsterdam　has　been　fain　for　many　Years　to　lay　down　the　Taxes　for　them；　which　is；　in　effect；　to　pay　the　Taxes　of　Guelderland　too。　　　　　Struggle　and　contrive　as　you　will；　lay　your　Taxes　as　you　please；　the　Traders　will　shift　it　off　from　their　own　Gain；　the　Merchants　will　bear　the　least　part　of　it；　and　grow　poor　last。　In　Holland　it　self；　where　Trade　is　so　loaded；　who；　I　pray；　grows　richest；　the　Land…holder　or　the　Trader？　Which　of　them　is　pinch'd；　and　wants　Money　most？　A　Country　may　thrive；　the　Country　Gentleman　grow　rich；　and　his　Rents　encrease　（for　so　it　has　been　here）　whilst　the　Land　is　Taxed：　But　I　challenge　any　one　to　shew　me　a　Country；　wherein　there　is　any　considerable　publick　Charge　raised；　where　the　Land　does　not　most　sensibly　feel　it；　and　in　proportion　bear　much　the　greater　part　of　it。　　　　　We　must　not　therefore　impute　the　falling　of　the　Rents；　or　of　the　price　of　Land；　to　high　Interest；　Nor；　if　ill　Husbandry　has　wasted　our　Riches；　hope　by　such　kind　of　Laws　to　raise　them　to　their　former　value。　I　humbly　conceive　we　shall　in　vain　endeavour　it　by　the　fall　of　Interest：　The　number　of　Buyers　must　be　increased；　and　Sellers　lessen'd；　which　must　be　done　by　other　ways；　than　regulating　of　Interest；　or　else　the　Landed…man　will　neither　find　Chapmen　for　his　Land；　nor　for　the　Corn　that　grows　on　it；　at　the　rate　he　desires。　　　　　But　could　an　Act　of　Parliament；　bring　down　Interest　to　Four　per　Cent。　and　the　lowering　of　that　immediately　raise　the　Purchasers　Fine　from　20　to　25　Years　Purchase；　yet　it　may　be　doubted；　whether　this　be　fit　to　be　made　into　a　Law；　because　it　would　be　of　no　advantage　to　the　Kingdom。　For　what　profit　would　it　be　to　the　Nation　to　make　a　Law；　that　he　who　sells　Land　should　instead　of　Four　have　Five　hundred　pounds　of　the　Purchaser？　This　indeed　a　little　alters　the　distribution　of　the　Money；　we　have　amongst　us　Englishmen　here　at　home；　but　neither　helps　to　continue　what　we　have；　nor　brings　in　more　from　abroad：　Which　being　the　only　concernment　of　the　Kingdom；　in　reference　to　its　Wealth；　is　apt　to　be　supposed　by　us　without　doors　to　be　the　only　care　of　a　Parliament。　For　it　matters　not；　so　it　be　here　amongst　us；　whether　the　Money　be　in　Thomas　or　Richards　Hands；　provided　it　be　so　order'd；　that；　whoever　has　it；　may　be　encouraged　to　let　it　go　into　the　current　of　Trade；　for　the　improvement　of　the　general　stock；　and　wealth　of　the　Nation。　　　　　As　this　increase　of　the　Fine　in　the　purchase　of　Land　is　not　an　advantage　to　the　kingdom；　so　neither　is　it　to　the　Landholder；　who　is　the　person；　that　bearing　the　greatest　part　of　the　burthens　of　the　Kingdom；　ought；　I　think；　to　have　the　greatest　care　taken　of　him；　and　enjoy　as　many　Privileges；　and　as　much　Wealth；　as　the　favour　of　the　Law　can　（with　regard　to　the　Publick…weal）　confer　upon　him。　But　pray　consider：　The　raising　the　Price　of　Land　in　Sale　by　increasing　the　number　of　Years　Purchase　to　be　paid　for　it；　gives　the　advantage　not　to　the　Landholder；　but　to　him　that　ceases　to　be　so。　He　that　has　no　longer　the　Land　has　the　more　Money；　and　he　who　has　the　Land　is　the　poorer。　The　true　advantage　of　the　Landholder　is；　that　his　Corn；　Flesh；　and　Wool；　sell　better；　and　yield　a　greater　price；　this　indeed　is　a　profit；　that　benefits　the　owner　of　the　Land；　and　goes　along　with　it：　It　is　this　alone　raises　the　Rent；　and　makes　the　Possessor　richer：　and　this　can　only　be　done　by　increasing　our　Wealth；　and　drawing　more　Money　into　England；　which　the　falling　of　Interest；　and　thereby　（if　it　could　effect　it）　raising　the　Purchase　of　Land　is　so　far　from　doing；　that　it　does　visibly　and　directly　one　way　hinder　our　increase　of　Wealth；　that　is；　by　hindring　Foreigners　to　come　here；　and　buy　Land；　and　settle　amongst　us。　Whereby　we　have　this　double　loss；　First　we　lose　their　Persons；　increase　of　People　being　the　increase　both　of　Strength　and　Riches。　Secondly　we　lose　so　much　Money。　For　tho'　whatever　an　Englishman　gives　to　another　for　Land；　though　raised　to　Forty　Years　Purchase；　be　not　one　Farthing　advantage　to　the　kingdom；　yet　whatever　a　Foreigner；　who　purchases　Land　here；　gives　for　it；　is　so　much　every　Farthing　clear　gain　to　the　Nation：　For　that　Money　comes　clear　in；　without　carrying　out　any　thing　for　it；　and　is　every　Farthing　of　it　as　perfect　Gain　to　the　Nation　as　if　it　drop'd　down　from　the　Clouds。　　　　　But　farther；　if　consideration　be　to　be　had　only　of　Sellers　of　Land；　the　lowering　of　Interest　to　Four　per　Cent。　will　not　be　in　their　favour；　unless；　by　it；　you　can　raise　Land　to　Thirty　Years　Purchase；　which　is　not　at　all　likely：　And　I　think　no　Body　by　falling　of　Interest　to　Four　per　Cent。　hopes　to　get　Chapmen　for　their　Land　at　that　Rate。　Whatsoever　they　have　less；　if　Law　can　regulate　Interest；　they　lose　of　their　value　of　Land；　Money　being　thus　abased。　So　that　the　Landed　man　will　scarce　find　his　account　neither　by　this　Law；　when　it　comes　to　trial。　And　at　last；　I　imagine；　this　will　be　the　result　of　all　such　Attempts；　that　Experience　will