友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
飞读中文网 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

god the invisible king-第3章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!





GOD THE INVISIBLE KING

CHAPTER THE FIRST THE COSMOGONY OF MODERN RELIGION

1。 MODERN RELIGION HAS NO FOUNDER

Perhaps all religions; unless the flaming onset of Mohammedanism be  an exception; have dawned imperceptibly upon the world。  A little  while ago and the thing was not; and then suddenly it has been found  in existence; and already in a state of diffusion。  People have  begun to hear of the new belief first here and then there。  It is  interesting; for example; to trace how Christianity drifted into the  consciousness of the Roman world。  But when a religion has been  interrogated it has always had hitherto a tale of beginnings; the  name and story of a founder。  The renascent religion that is now  taking shape; it seems; had no founder; it points to no origins。  It  is the Truth; its believers declare; it has always been here; it has  always been visible to those who had eyes to see。  It is perhaps  plainer than it was and to more peoplethat is all。 It is as if it still did not realise its own difference。  Many of  those who hold it still think of it as if it were a kind of  Christianity。  Some; catching at a phrase of Huxley's; speak of it  as Christianity without Theology。  They do not know the creed they  are carrying。  It has; as a matter of fact; a very fine and subtle  theology; flatly opposed to any belief that could; except by great  stretching of charity and the imagination; be called Christianity。   One might find; perhaps; a parallelism with the system ascribed to  some Gnostics; but that is far more probably an accidental rather  than a sympathetic coincidence。  Of that the reader shall presently  have an opportunity of judging。 This indefiniteness of statement and relationship is probably only  the opening phase of the new faith。  Christianity also began with an  extreme neglect of definition。  It was not at first anything more  than a sect of Judaism。  It was only after three centuries; amidst  the uproar and emotions of the council of Nicaea; when the more  enthusiastic Trinitarians stuffed their fingers in their ears in  affected horror at the arguments of old Arius; that the cardinal  mystery of the Trinity was established as the essential fact of  Christianity。  Throughout those three centuries; the centuries of  its greatest achievements and noblest martyrdoms; Christianity had  not defined its God。  And even to…day it has to be noted that a  large majority of those who possess and repeat the Christian creeds  have come into the practice so insensibly from unthinking childhood;  that only in the slightest way do they realise the nature of the  statements to which they subscribe。  They will speak and think of  both Christ and God in ways flatly incompatible with the doctrine of  the Triune deity upon which; theoretically; the entire fabric of all  the churches rests。  They will show themselves as frankly Arians as  though that damnable heresy had not been washed out of the world  forever after centuries of persecution in torrents of blood。  But  whatever the present state of Christendom in these matters may be;  there can be no doubt of the enormous pains taken in the past to  give Christian beliefs the exactest; least ambiguous statement  possible。  Christianity knew itself clearly for what it was in its  maturity; whatever the indecisions of its childhood or the  confusions of its decay。  The renascent religion that one finds now;  a thing active and sufficient in many minds; has still scarcely come  to self…consciousness。  But it is so coming; and this present book  is very largely an attempt to state the shape it is assuming and to  compare it with the beliefs and imperatives and usages of the  various Christian; pseudo…Christian; philosophical; and agnostic  cults amidst which it has appeared。 The writer's sympathies and convictions are entirely with this that  he speaks of as renascent or modern religion; he is neither atheist  nor Buddhist nor Mohammedan nor Christian。  He will make no  pretence; therefore; to impartiality and detachment。  He will do his  best to be as fair as possible and as candid as possible; but the  reader must reckon with this bias。  He has found this faith growing  up in himself; he has found it; or something very difficult to  distinguish from it; growing independently in the minds of men and  women he has met。  They have been people of very various origins;  English; Americans; Bengalis; Russians; French; people brought up in  a 〃Catholic atmosphere;〃 Positivists; Baptists; Sikhs; Mohammedans。   Their diversity of source is as remarkable as their convergence of  tendency。  A miscellany of minds thinking upon parallel lines has  come out to the same light。  The new teaching is also traceable in  many professedly Christian religious books and it is to be heard  from Christian pulpits。  The phase of definition is manifestly at  hand。

2。 MODERN RELIGION HAS A FINITE GOD

Perhaps the most fundamental difference between this new faith and  any recognised form of Christianity is that; knowingly or  unknowingly; it worships A FINITE GOD。  Directly the believer is  fairly confronted with the plain questions of the case; the vague  identifications that are still carelessly made with one or all of  the persons of the Trinity dissolve away。  He will admit that his  God is neither all…wise; nor all…powerful; nor omnipresent; that he  is neither the maker of heaven nor earth; and that he has little to  identify him with that hereditary God of the Jews who became the  〃Father〃 in the Christian system。  On the other hand he will assert  that his God is a god of salvation; that he is a spirit; a person; a  strongly marked and knowable personality; loving; inspiring; and  lovable; who exists or strives to exist in every human soul。  He  will be much less certain in his denials that his God has a close  resemblance to the Pauline (as distinguished from the Trinitarian)  〃Christ。〃 。 。 。 The modern religious man will almost certainly profess a kind of  universalism; he will assert that whensoever men have called upon  any God and have found fellowship and comfort and courage and that  sense of God within them; that inner light which is the quintessence  of the religious experience; it was the True God that answered them。   For the True God is a generous God; not a jealous God; the very  antithesis of that bickering monopolist who 〃will have none other  gods but Me〃; and when a human heart cries outto what name it  matters notfor a larger spirit and a stronger help than the  visible things of life can give; straightway the nameless Helper is  with it and the God of Man answers to the call。  The True God has no  scorn nor hate for those who have accepted the many…handed symbols  of the Hindu or the lacquered idols of China。  Where there is faith;  where there is need; there is the True God ready to clasp the hands  that stretch out seeking for him into the darkness behind the ivory  and gold。 The fact that God is FINITE is one upon which those who think  clearly among the new believers are very insistent。  He is; above  everything else; a personality; and to be a personality is to have  characteristics; to be limited by characteristics; he is a Being;  not us but dealing with us
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!