按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
inoperative。
On the next day appeared the 〃Appeal of the Independent Democrats in Congress to the People of the United States。〃 The paper was written by Chase and corrected by Sumner。 It denounced the original Kansas…Nebraska bill as a gross violation of a sacred pledge； a criminal betrayal of precious rights； part of an atrocious plot to exclude free labor and convert the Territory into a dreary region of despotism inhabited by masters and slaves； a bold scheme against American liberty； worthy of an accomplished architect of ruin。 It declared in a postscript； written after the substitute bill was offered by Douglas on January 23d； that not a man in Congress or out of it； not even Douglas himself； pretended at the time of their passage that the measures of 1850 would repeal the Missouri Compromise。 〃Will the people；〃 it asked； 〃permit their dearest interests to be thus made the mere hazards of a presidential game and destroyed by false facts and false inferences？〃
The Appeal； which （except the postscript） was written before the substitute was offered； was published in many papers in the North and produced a deep sensation。 On the 30th Douglas entered the Senate Chamber angry and excited。 He had already begun to hear the distant mutterings of the storm。 He opened the debate on his substituted bill； but he was smarting under the cruel lash and； before beginning his argument； poured out his rage on the authors of the Appeal。 He accused Chase of treacherously procuring a postponement of the consideration of the bill for a week in order to circulate their libel upon him。 Chase interrupted him with angry emphasis。 Douglas waxed furious and poured out his 〃senatorial billingsgate〃 upon the offenders。 Yet； amidst his wrath； he kept his head and made a keen and ingenious defense of his course。
The basis of his argument was the proposition； assumed though no where stated； that while the laws of Congress were specific and enacted to meet particular demands； the PRINCIPLE embodied in each law was general； and if the philosophic principle of any law was repugnant to that of any prior law； however foreign to each other the subjects might be； the latter must be held to repeal the former by implication； that the principle of the legislation of 1850 was repugnant to that of the Missouri Compromise and hence repealed it。
Chase at once replied briefly to the fiery attack； and on February 3d delivered an elaborate speech against the bill； which Douglas recognized as the strongest of the session。 As a legal argument it was a complete and crushing answer to the quibbling sophistry of the advocates of implied repeal。 But it was not merely the argument of a great lawyer。 It was the earnest remonstrance of a moralist who believed in the eternal and immeasurable difference between right and wrong。
He reminded them that the Missouri Compromise was a Southern measure； approved by a Southern President； on the advice of a Southern Cabinet。 While in form a law； it had all the moral obligation of a solemn contract。 The considerations for the perpetual exclusion of slavery in the Territories north of 36 degrees and 30 minutes were the admission of Missouri with slavery； the permission of slavery in the Territories south of 36 degrees and 30 minutes； and the admission of new States south of that line with slavery if their constitution should so provide。 The North had honorably performed its contract by the admission of Missouri and prompt consent to the admission of all other slave States that had sought it。 The South had yielded nothing to the North under the contract； except the admission of Iowa and the organization of Minnesota。 The slave States； having received all the contemplated benefits under the contract and yielded none； proposed to declare it ended without the consent of the free States。 He closed with an appeal to the honor of the South； earnestly imploring the Senators to reject the bill as a violation of the plighted faith and solemn compact which their fathers had made and which they were bound by every sacred obligation faithfully to maintain。
Seward； speaking on the 17th cautioned them that the repeal of the Compromise would be the destruction of the equilibrium between the North and the South so long maintained； the loss of which would be the wreck of the Union。 He warned the North that if this territory was surrendered to slavery the South would be vested with permanent control of the Government； for every branch of it would be securely within its power。 Already it had absolute sway。 One slave…holder in a new Territory； with access to the Executive ear at Washington； exercised more political influence than five hundred free men。 The recital of an old repeal was made for the demagogic purpose of confusing the people； but was false in fact and false in law。 The Missouri Compromise was a purely local act。 That of 1850 was likewise local。 They affected entirely different localities。 Hence the later law could not by implication repeal the former。 It was an ingenious device to attain the desired end by declaring that done by a former Congress which no one then thought of doing； and which the present Congress dared not boldly do。 The doctrine of popular sovereignty meant that the Federal Government should abandon its constitutional duty and abdicate its power over he Territory in favor of the first band of squatters who settled within it。 It meant that the interested cupidity of the first chance settlers was more fit to guide the destinies of the infant Territory than the collective wisdom of the American people。
Sumner； speaking a week later； declared that they were about to determine forever the character of a new empire。 An effort was made on false assumptions of fact； in violation of solemn covenants and the principles of the fathers； to open this immense region to slavery。 The measures of 1850 could not by any effort of interpretation； by any wand of power； by an perverse alchemy； be transmuted into a repeal of that prohibition of slavery。 The pending proposition was to abolish freedom。 When the conscience of mankind was at last aroused； they were about to open a new market to the traffickers in flesh who haunted the shambles of the South。 They had as much right to repudiate the purchase of Louisiana as this compact。 Despite the temporary success of their political maneuvers； let them not forget that the permanent and irresistible forces were all arrayed against them。 The plough； the steam engine； the railroad； the telegraph； the book； were all waging war on slavery。 Its opponents could bide the storm of vituperation and calmly await the judgment of the future。
There was at no time the slightest doubt that the bill would pass； and the arguments against it were in the nature of protests against a wrong that could not be averted and appeals to the future to redress it。
From the beginning it had a well organized majority。 But； assailed by the invectives of Chase； Seward and Sumner； it could not stand before the world undefended。 There was but one man enlisted in its support at all fit to measure swords with any of these great leaders； but he was undoubtedly more than a match for them a