按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
in…itself is only an abstract； one…sided moment。 Hence the advance is not a kind of superfluity；
this it would be if that with which the beginning is made were in truth already the absolute； the
advance consists rather in the universal determining itself and being for itself the universal； that is；
equally an individual and a subject。 Only in its consummation is it the absolute。
It is to be recalled that the beginning； which is in itself a concrete totality； may as beginning also
be free and its immediacy have the determination of an external existence； the germ of the
living being and the subjective end in general have proved themselves to be such beginnings and
therefore both are themselves urges。
The non…spiritual and inanimate； on the contrary； are the Notion only as real possibility； cause is
the highest stage in which the concrete Notion； as a beginning in the sphere of necessity has an
immediate existence； but it is not yet a subject that maintains itself as such even in its actual
realisation。 The sun； for example； and in general all inanimate things； are determinate concrete
existences in which real possibility remains an inner totality and the moments of the totality are not
posited in subjective form in them and； in so far as they realise themselves； attain an existence by
means of other corporeal individuals。
2。 The concrete totality which makes the beginning contains as such within itself the beginning of
the advance and development。 As concrete； it is differentiated within itself： but by reason of its
first immediacy the first differentiated determinations are in the first instance merely a diversity。
The immediate； however； as self…related universality； as subject； is also the unity of these diverse
determinations。 This reflection is the first stage of the movement onwards … the emergence of real
difference； judgement； the process of determining in general。 The essential point is that the
absolute method finds and cognises the determination of the universal within the latter itself。 The
procedure of the finite cognition of the understanding here is to take up again； equally externally；
what it has left out in its creation of the universal by a process of abstraction。
The absolute method； on the contrary； does not behave like external reflection but takes the
determinate element from its own subject matter； since it is itself that subject matter's immanent
principle and soul。 This is what Plato demanded of cognition； that it should consider things in and
for themselves； that is； should consider them partly in their universality； but also that it should not
stray away from them catching at circumstances； examples and comparisons； but should keep
before it solely the things themselves and bring before consciousness what is immanent in them。
The method of absolute cognition is to this extent analytic。 That it finds the further determination
of its initial universal simply and solely in that universal； is the absolute objectivity of the Notion； of
which objectivity the method is the certainty。 But the method is no less synthetic； since its subject
matter； determined immediately as a simple universal； by virtue of the determinateness which it
possesses in its very immediacy and universality； exhibits itself as an other。
This relation of differential elements which the subject matter thus is within itself； is however no
longer the same thing as is meant by synthesis in finite cognition； the mere fact of the subject
matter's no less analytic determination in general； that the relation is relation within the Notion；
completely distinguishes it from the latter synthesis。
This no less synthetic than analytic moment of judgement； by which the universal of the beginning
of its own accord determines itself as the other of itself； is to be named the dialectical moment。
＇Lenin's Summary of Dialectics appears at this point in Lenin's annotations＇
Dialectic is one of those ancient sciences that have been most misunderstood in the metaphysics of
the moderns； as well as by popular philosophy in general； ancient and modern alike。
Diogenes Laertius says of Plato that； just as Thales was the founder of natural philosophy and
Socrates of moral philosophy； so Plato was the founder of the third science pertaining to
philosophy； namely； dialectic … a service which the ancient world esteemed his highest； but which
often remains quite overlooked by those who have most to say about him。
Dialectic has often been regarded as an art； as though it rested on a subjective talent and did not
belong to the objectivity of the Notion。 The shape it takes and the result it reaches in Kantian
philosophy have already been pointed out in the specific examples of the Kantian view of it。 It
must be regarded as a step of infinite importance that dialectic is once more recognised as
necessary to reason； although the result to be drawn from it must be the opposite of that arrived at
by Kant。
Besides the fact that dialectic is generally regarded as contingent； it usually takes the following
more precise form。 It is shown that there belongs to some subject matter or other； for example the
world； motion； point； and so on； some determination or other； for example （taking the objects in
the order named）； finite in space or time； presence in this place； absolute negation of space； but
further； that with equal necessity the opposite determination also belongs to the subject matter； for
example； infinity in space and time； non…presence in this place； relation to space and so spatiality。
The older Eleatic school directed its dialectic chiefly against motion。 Plato frequently against the
general ideas and notions of his time； especially those of the Sophists； but also against the pure
categories and the determinations of reflection； the more cultivated scepticism of a later period
extended it not only to the immediate so…called facts of consciousness and maxims of common life；
but also to all the notions of science。
Now the conclusion drawn from dialectic of this kind is in general the contradiction and nullity of
the assertion made。 But this conclusion can be drawn in either of two senses either in the objective
sense； that the subject matter which in such a manner contradicts itself cancels itself out and is null
and void … this was； for example； the conclusion of the Eleatics； according to which truth was
denied； for example； to the world； to motion； to the point； or in the subjective sense； that cognition
is defective。
One way of understanding the latter sense of the conclusion is that it is only this dialectic that
imposes on us the trick of an illusion。 This is the common view of so…called sound common sense
which takes its stand on the evidence of the senses and on customary conceptions and
judgements。 Sometimes it takes this dialectic lightly； as when Diogenes the cynic exposes the
hollowness of the dialectic of motion by silently walking up and down；； but often it flies into a
passion； seeing it in perhaps a piece of sheer foolery； or； when morally important objects are
concerned； an outrage that tries to unsettle what is essentially established