按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
self…subsistence is so far only abstract universality。 It has now attained the determination of
objectivity; but as moment of the Notion; this complete difference is enclosed within the simple
unity of the Notion。 Now in so far as end is this total reflection of objectivity into itself and is so
immediately; in the first place; the self…determination or particularity as simple reflection into self
is distinct from the concrete form; and is a determinate content。 From this side; end is finite;
although in respect of its form it is infinite subjectivity。 Secondly; because its determinateness has
the form of subjective indifference; it has the shape of a presupposition; and from this side its
finitude consists in its being confronted by an objective; mechanical and chemical world to which
its activity relates itself as to something already there; its self…determining activity is thus; in its
identity; immediately external to itself and as much reflection outwards as reflection…into…self。 To
this extent end still has a genuinely extramundane existence — to the extent; namely; that it is
confronted by this objectivity; just as the latter on the other hand confronts it as a mechanical and
chemical whole not yet determined and pervaded by the end。
Accordingly; the movement of end can now be expressed as having for its aim to sublate its
presupposition; that is the immediacy of the object; and to posit the object as determined by the
Notion。 This negative attitude towards the object is just as much a negative attitude towards itself;
a sublating of the subjectivity of the end。 Positively; it is the realisation of the end; namely; the
union of objective being with it; so that this being; which; as a moment of the end is immediately
the determinateness identical with it; shall appear as external determinateness; and conversely the
objective as presupposition shall instead be posited as determined by the Notion。 End is in its
own self the urge to realise itself; the determinateness of the moments of the Notion is externality;
but their simplicity in the unity of the Notion is inadequate to the nature of this unity; and the
Notion therefore repels itself from itself。 This repulsion is in general the resolution 'Entschluss' of
the relation of the negative unity to itself; whereby it is exclusive individuality; but by this
exclusion 'Ausschliessen' it resolves itself 'sich entschliesst' or opens up itself 'schliesst sich
auf'; because this exclusion is a self…determining; as positing of its own self。 On the one hand
subjectivity in determining itself makes itself into particularity; gives itself a content which; enclosed
within the unity of the Notion; is still an inner one; but this positing; the simple reflection…into…self;
is immediately; as we have seen; also a presupposing; and in the same moment in which the
subject of the end determines itself; it is related to an indifferent; external objectivity which is to be
equated by it with the said inner determinateness; that is to say; is to be posited as something
determined by the Notion; and in the first instance as means。
B。 The Means
The first immediate positing in end is at one and the same time the positing of an internality; that
is; of something determined as posited; and the presupposing of an objective world which is
indifferent to the determination of end。 But the subjectivity of end is absolute negative unity: its
second determining is; therefore; the sublating of this presupposition altogether; this sublating is the
return…into…self in so far as by it is sublated that moment of the first negative; the positing of the
negative as against the subject; the external object。 But as against the presupposition or the
immediacy of the determining; as against the objective world; it is as yet only the first negation;
itself immediate and therefore external。 This positing is therefore not yet the realised end itself; but
only the initial step towards it。 The object thus determined is so far only the means。
The end unites itself through a means with objectivity; and in objectivity with itself。 The means is
the middle term of the syllogism。 The end; because it is finite; requires a means for its realisation…a
means; that is a middle term; that at the same time has the shape of an external existence
indifferent to the end itself and its realisation。 The absolute Notion possesses mediation within itself
in such a manner that its first positing is not a presupposing whose object would have indifferent
externality for its fundamental determination; on the contrary; the world as a creation has only the
form of such externality; but its fundamental determination is really constituted by its negativity and
positedness。 The finitude of end consists accordingly in this; that its determining is altogether
external to itself; and so its first determining; as we have seen; divides itself into a positing and a
presupposing; therefore the negation of this determining; too; is so far only in one aspect already
a reflection…into…self; in the other; it is in fact merely a first negation; in other words the very
reflection…into…self is also external to itself and a reflection outwards。
The means is therefore the formal middle term of a formal syllogism; it is external as against the
extreme of the subjective end; and therefore also to the extreme of the objective end; just as
particularity in the formal syllogism is an indifferent medius terminus that can be replaced by
others。 Further; just as this particularity is middle term only by being determinateness in relation to
one extreme and a universal in relation to the other; and therefore owes its mediating determination
to its relation to other terms; so the means; too; is only the mediating middle term; first because it is
an immediate object; secondly because it is a means by virtue of the relation it possesses
externally to the extreme of the end…a relation that is for it a form to which it is indifferent。
Notion and objectivity are therefore only externally combined in the means; which is accordingly a
merely mechanical object。 The relation of the object to the end is a premise; or the immediate
relation which with regard to the end has been shown to be reflection into itself; the means; is an
inhering predicate; its objectivity is subsumed under the determination of end which on account of
its concretion is universality。 By virtue of this determination of end present in the means; the latter
is now also subsumptive in relation to the other extreme of the initially still indeterminate
objectivity。 Conversely; in contrast to the subjective end; the means; as immediate objectivity;
has a universality of existence that the subjective individuality of the end still lacks。 The end
being thus in the first instance only an external determinateness in the means; it is itself; as a
negative unity; outside it; just as the means is a mechanical object that possesses the end only as a
determinateness; not as simple concretion of the totality。 As the unifying element; however; the
middle term must itself be the totality of the end。 It has been seen that the determination of end in