友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
飞读中文网 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

cratylus-第38章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!






SOCRATES:  Doxa is either derived from dioxis (pursuit); and expresses the

march of the soul in the pursuit of knowledge; or from the shooting of a

bow (toxon); the latter is more likely; and is confirmed by oiesis

(thinking); which is only oisis (moving); and implies the movement of the

soul to the essential nature of each thingjust as boule (counsel) has to

do with shooting (bole); and boulesthai (to wish) combines the notion of

aiming and deliberatingall these words seem to follow doxa; and all

involve the idea of shooting; just as aboulia; absence of counsel; on the

other hand; is a mishap; or missing; or mistaking of the mark; or aim; or

proposal; or object。



HERMOGENES:  You are quickening your pace now; Socrates。



SOCRATES:  Why yes; the end I now dedicate to God; not; however; until I

have explained anagke (necessity); which ought to come next; and ekousion

(the voluntary)。  Ekousion is certainly the yielding (eikon) and

unresistingthe notion implied is yielding and not opposing; yielding; as

I was just now saying; to that motion which is in accordance with our will;

but the necessary and resistant being contrary to our will; implies error

and ignorance; the idea is taken from walking through a ravine which is

impassable; and rugged; and overgrown; and impedes motionand this is the

derivation of the word anagkaion (necessary) an agke ion; going through a

ravine。  But while my strength lasts let us persevere; and I hope that you

will persevere with your questions。



HERMOGENES:  Well; then; let me ask about the greatest and noblest; such as

aletheia (truth) and pseudos (falsehood) and on (being); not forgetting to

enquire why the word onoma (name); which is the theme of our discussion;

has this name of onoma。



SOCRATES:  You know the word maiesthai (to seek)?



HERMOGENES:  Yes;meaning the same as zetein (to enquire)。



SOCRATES:  The word onoma seems to be a compressed sentence; signifying on

ou zetema (being for which there is a search); as is still more obvious in

onomaston (notable); which states in so many words that real existence is

that for which there is a seeking (on ou masma); aletheia is also an

agglomeration of theia ale (divine wandering); implying the divine motion

of existence; pseudos (falsehood) is the opposite of motion; here is

another ill name given by the legislator to stagnation and forced inaction;

which he compares to sleep (eudein); but the original meaning of the word

is disguised by the addition of psi; on and ousia are ion with an iota

broken off; this agrees with the true principle; for being (on) is also

moving (ion); and the same may be said of not being; which is likewise

called not going (oukion or ouki on = ouk ion)。



HERMOGENES:  You have hammered away at them manfully; but suppose that some

one were to say to you; what is the word ion; and what are reon and doun?

show me their fitness。



SOCRATES:  You mean to say; how should I answer him?



HERMOGENES:  Yes。



SOCRATES:  One way of giving the appearance of an answer has been already

suggested。



HERMOGENES:  What way?



SOCRATES:  To say that names which we do not understand are of foreign

origin; and this is very likely the right answer; and something of this

kind may be true of them; but also the original forms of words may have

been lost in the lapse of ages; names have been so twisted in all manner of

ways; that I should not be surprised if the old language when compared with

that now in use would appear to us to be a barbarous tongue。



HERMOGENES:  Very likely。



SOCRATES:  Yes; very likely。  But still the enquiry demands our earnest

attention and we must not flinch。  For we should remember; that if a person

go on analysing names into words; and enquiring also into the elements out

of which the words are formed; and keeps on always repeating this process;

he who has to answer him must at last give up the enquiry in despair。



HERMOGENES:  Very true。



SOCRATES:  And at what point ought he to lose heart and give up the


enquiry?  Must he not stop when he comes to the names which are the

elements of all other names and sentences; for these cannot be supposed to

be made up of other names?  The word agathon (good); for example; is; as we

were saying; a compound of agastos (admirable) and thoos (swift)。  And

probably thoos is made up of other elements; and these again of others。 

But if we take a word which is incapable of further resolution; then we

shall be right in saying that we have at last reached a primary element;

which need not be resolved any further。



HERMOGENES:  I believe you to be in the right。



SOCRATES:  And suppose the names about which you are now asking should turn

out to be primary elements; must not their truth or law be examined

according to some new method?



HERMOGENES:  Very likely。



SOCRATES:  Quite so; Hermogenes; all that has preceded would lead to this

conclusion。  And if; as I think; the conclusion is true; then I shall again

say to you; come and help me; that I may not fall into some absurdity in

stating the principle of primary names。



HERMOGENES:  Let me hear; and I will do my best to assist you。



SOCRATES:  I think that you will acknowledge with me; that one principle is

applicable to all names; primary as well as secondarywhen they are

regarded simply as names; there is no difference in them。



HERMOGENES:  Certainly not。



SOCRATES:  All the names that we have been explaining were intended to

indicate the nature of things。



HERMOGENES:  Of course。



SOCRATES:  And that this is true of the primary quite as much as of the

secondary names; is implied in their being names。



HERMOGENES:  Surely。



SOCRATES:  But the secondary; as I conceive; derive their significance from

the primary。



HERMOGENES:  That is evident。



SOCRATES:  Very good; but then how do the primary names which precede

analysis show the natures of things; as far as they can be shown; which

they must do; if they are to be real names?  And here I will ask you a

question:  Suppose that we had no voice or tongue; and wanted to

communicate with one another; should we not; like the deaf and dumb; make

signs with the hands and head and the rest of the body?



HERMOGENES:  There would be no choice; Socrates。



SOCRATES:  We should imitate the nature of the thing; the elevation of our

hands to heaven would mean lightness and upwardness; heaviness and

downwardness would be expressed by letting them drop to the ground; if we

were describing the running of a horse; or any other animal; we should make

our bodies and their gestures as like as we could to them。



HERMOGENES:  I do not see that we could do anything else。



SOCRATES:  We could not; for by bodily imitation only can the body ever

express anything。



HERMOGENES:  Very true。



SOCRATES:  And when we want to express ourselves; either with the voice; or

tongue; or mouth; the expres
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!