按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
unes； but the poverty of the whole binders them from having so much luxury as in a more opulent government。
Luxury is also in proportion to the populousness of the towns； and especially of the capital； so that it is in a compound proportion to the riches of the state； to the inequality of private fortunes； and to the number of people settled in particular places。
In proportion to the populousness of towns； the inhabitants are filled with notions of vanity； and actuated by an ambition of distinguishing themselves by trifles。＇2＇ If they are very numerous； and most of them strangers to one another； their vanity redoubles； because there are greater hopes of success。 As luxury inspires these hopes； each man assumes the marks of a superior condition。 But by endeavouring thus at distinction； every one becomes equal； and distinction ceases； as all are desirous of respect； nobody is regarded。
Hence arises a general inconvenience。 Those who excel in a profession set what value they please on their labour； this example is followed by people of inferior abilities； and then there is an end of all proportion between our wants and the means of satisfying them。 When I am forced to go to law； I must be able to fee counsel； when I am sick； I must have it in my power to fee a physician。
It is the opinion of several that the assemblage of so great a multitude of people in capital cities is an obstruction to commerce； because the inhabitants are no longer at a proper distance from each other。 But I cannot think so； for men have more desires； more wants； more fancies； when they live together。
2。 Of sumptuary Laws in a Democracy。 We have observed that in a republic； where riches are equally divided； there can be no such thing as luxury； and as we have shown in the 5th Book＇3＇ that this equal distribution constitutes the excellence of a republican government； hence it follows； that the less luxury there is in a republic； the more it is perfect。 There was none among the old Romans； none among the Laced？monians； and in republics where this equality is not quite lost； the spirit of commerce； industry； and virtue renders every man able and willing to live on his own property； and consequently prevents the growth of luxury。
The laws concerning the new division of lands； insisted upon so eagerly in some republics； were of the most salutary nature。 They are dangerous； only as they are sudden。 By reducing instantly the wealth of some； and increasing that of others； they form a revolution in each family； and must produce a general one in the state。
In proportion as luxury gains ground in a republic； the minds of the people are turned towards their particular interests。 Those who are allowed only what is necessary have nothing but their own reputation and their country's glory in view。 But a soul depraved by luxury has many other desires； and soon becomes an enemy to the laws that confine it。 The luxury in which the garrison of Rhegium began to live was the cause of their massacring the inhabitants。
No sooner were the Romans corrupted than their desires became boundless and immense。 Of this we may judge by the price they set on things。 A pitcher of Falernian wine＇4＇ was sold for a hundred Roman denarii； a barrel of salt meat from the kingdom of Pontus cost four hundred； a good cook four talents； and for boys； no price was reckoned too great。 When the whole world； impelled by the force of corruption； is immersed in voluptuousness＇5＇ what must then become of virtue？
3。 Of sumptuary Laws in an Aristocracy。 There is this inconvenience in an ill…constituted aristocracy； that the wealth centres in the nobility； and yet they are not allowed to spend； for as luxury is contrary to the spirit of moderation； it must be banished thence。 This government comprehends； therefore； only people who are extremely poor and cannot acquire； and people who are vastly rich and cannot spend。
In Venice； they are compelled by the laws to moderation。 They are so habituated to parsimony that none but courtesans can make them part with their money。 Such is the method made use of for the support of industry； the most contemptible of women may be profuse without danger； whilst those who contribute to their extravagance consume their days in the greatest obscurity。
Admirable in this respect were the institutions of the principal republics of Greece。 The rich employed their money in festivals； musical choruses； chariots； horse…races； and chargeable offices。 Wealth was； therefore； as burdensome there as poverty。
4。 Of sumptuary Laws in a Monarchy。 Tacitus says＇6＇ that the Suiones； a German nation； has a particular respect for riches； for which reason they live under the government of one person。 This shows that luxury is extremely proper for monarchies； and that under this government there must be no sumptuary laws。
As riches； by the very constitution of monarchies； are unequally divided； there is an absolute necessity for luxury。 Were the rich not to be lavish； the poor would starve。 It is even necessary here that the expenses of the opulent should be in proportion to the inequality of fortunes； and that luxury； as we have already observed； should increase in this proportion。 The augmentation of private wealth is owing to its having deprived one part of the citizens of their necessary support； this must therefore be restored to them。
Hence it is that for the preservation of a monarchical state； luxury ought continually to increase； and to grow more extensive； as it rises from the labourer to the artificer； to the merchant； to the magistrate； to the nobility； to the great officers of state； up to the very prince； otherwise the nation will be undone。
In the reign of Augustus； a proposal was made in the Roman senate； which was composed of grave magistrates； learned civilians； and of men whose heads were filled with the notion of the primitive times； to reform the manners and luxury of women。 It is curious to see in Dio；＇7＇ with what art this prince eluded the importunate solicitations of those senators。 This was because he was founding a monarchy； and dissolving a republic。
Under Tiberius； the ？diles proposed in the senate the re…establishment of the ancient sumptuary laws。＇8＇ This prince； who did not want sense； opposed it。 〃The state；〃 said he； 〃could not possibly subsist in the present situation of things。 How could Rome； how could the provinces； live？ We were frugal； while we were only masters of one city； now we consume the riches of the whole globe； and employ both the masters and their slaves in our service。〃 He plainly saw that sumptuary laws would not suit the present form of government。
When a proposal was made under the same emperor to the senate； to prohibit the governors from carrying their wives with them into the provinces； because of the dissoluteness and irregularity which followed those ladies； the proposal was rejected。 It was said that the examples of ancient austerity had been changed into a more agreeable method of living。＇9＇ They found there was a necessity for different manners。
Luxury is therefore absolutely necessary in monarchies； as it is also in despotic states。 In the former； it is the use of liberty； in the latter； it