友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
飞读中文网 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

on liberty-第30章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!





and usually diminishes; by a greater or less amount; the general



resource; of the community。 If he deteriorates his bodily or mental



faculties; he not only brings evil upon all who depended on him for



any portion of their happiness; but disqualifies himself for rendering



the services which he owes to his fellow creatures generally;



perhaps becomes a burthen on their affection or benevolence; and if



such conduct were very frequent; hardly any offence that is



committed would detract more from the general sum of good。 Finally; if



by his vices or follies a person does no direct harm to others; he



is nevertheless (it may be said) injurious by his example; and ought



to be compelled to control himself; for the sake of those whom the



sight or knowledge of his conduct might corrupt or mislead。



  And even (it will be added) if the consequences of misconduct



could be confined to the vicious or thoughtless individual; ought



society to abandon to their own guidance those who are manifestly



unfit for it? If protection against themselves is confessedly due to



children and persons under age; is not society equally bound to afford



it to persons of mature years who are equally incapable of



self…government? If gambling; or drunkenness; or incontinence; or



idleness; or uncleanliness; are as injurious to happiness; and as



great a hindrance to improvement; as many or most of the acts



prohibited by law; why (it may be asked) should not law; so far as



is consistent with practicability and social convenience; endeavour to



repress these also? And as a supplement to the unavoidable



imperfections of law; ought not opinion at least to organise a



powerful police against these vices; and visit rigidly with social



penalties those who are known to practise them? There is no question



here (it may be said) about restricting individuality; or impeding the



trial of new and original experiments in living。 The only things it is



sought to prevent are things which have been tried and condemned



from the beginning of the world until now; things which experience has



shown not to be useful or suitable to any person's individuality。



There must be some length of time and amount of experience after which



a moral or prudential truth may be regarded as established: and it



is merely desired to prevent generation after generation from



falling over the same precipice which has been fatal to their



predecessors。



  I fully admit that the mischief which a person does to himself may



seriously affect; both through their sympathies and their interests;



those nearly connected with him and; in a minor degree; society at



large。 When; by conduct of this sort; a person is led to violate a



distinct and assignable obligation to any other person or persons; the



case is taken out of the self…regarding class; and becomes amenable to



moral disapprobation in the proper sense of the term。 If; for example;



a man; through intemperance or extravagance; becomes unable to pay his



debts; or; having undertaken the moral responsibility of a family;



becomes from the same cause incapable of supporting or educating them;



he is deservedly reprobated; and might be justly punished; but it is



for the breach of duty to his family or creditors; not for the



extravagance。 If the resources which ought to have been devoted to



them; had been diverted from them for the most prudent investment; the



moral culpability would have been the same。 George Barnwell murdered



his uncle to get money for his mistress; but if he had done it to



set himself up in business; he would equally have been hanged。



Again; in the frequent case of a man who causes grief to his family by



addiction to bad habits; he deserves reproach for his unkindness or



ingratitude; but so he may for cultivating habits not in themselves



vicious; if they are painful to those with whom he passes his life;



who from personal ties are dependent on him for their comfort。 Whoever



fails in the consideration generally due to the interests and feelings



of others; not being compelled by some more imperative duty; or



justified by allowable self…preference; is a subject of moral



disapprobation for that failure; but not for the cause of it; nor



for the errors; merely personal to himself; which may have remotely



led to it。 In like manner; when a person disables himself; by



conduct purely self…regarding; from the performance of some definite



duty incumbent on him to the public; he is guilty of a social offence。



No person ought to be punished simply for being drunk; but a soldier



or a policeman should be punished for being drunk on duty。 Whenever;



in short; there is a definite damage; or a definite risk of damage;



either to an individual or to the public; the case is taken out of the



province of liberty; and placed in that of morality or law。



  But with regard to the merely contingent; or; as it may be called;



constructive injury which a person causes to society; by conduct which



neither violates any specific duty to the public; nor occasions



perceptible hurt to any assignable individual except himself; the



inconvenience is one which society can afford to bear; for the sake of



the greater good of human freedom。 If grown persons are to be punished



for not taking proper care of themselves; I would rather it were for



their own sake; than under pretence of preventing them from



impairing their capacity or rendering to society benefits which



society does not pretend it has a right to exact。 But I cannot consent



to argue the point as if society had no means of bringing its weaker



members up to its ordinary standard of rational conduct; except



waiting till they do something irrational; and then punishing them;



legally or morally; for it。 Society has had absolute power over them



during all the early portion of their existence: it has had the



whole period of childhood and nonage in which to try whether it



could make them capable of rational conduct in life。 The existing



generation is master both of the training and the entire circumstances



of the generation to come; it cannot indeed make them perfectly wise



and good; because it is itself so lamentably deficient in goodness and



wisdom; and its best efforts are not always; in individual cases;



its most successful ones; but it is perfectly well able to make the



rising generation; as a whole; as good as; and a little better than;



itself。 If society lets any considerable number of its members grow up



mere children; incapable of being acted on by rational consideration



of distant motives; society has itself to blame for the



consequences。 Armed not only with all the powers of education; but



with the ascendency which the authority of a received opinion always



exercises over the minds who are least fitted to judge for themselves;



and aided by the natural
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!