按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
ed to。
Some of our readers may remember a story which got abroad many years ago that a certain M。 Babinet； a scientific Frenchman of note； had predicted a serious accident soon to occur to the planet on which we live by the collision with it of a great comet then approaching us； or some such occurrence。 There is no doubt that this prediction produced anxiety and alarm in many timid persons。 It became a very interesting question with them who this M。 Babinet might be。 Was he a sound observer； who had made other observations and predictions which had proved accurate？ Or was he one of those men who are always making blunders for other people to correct？ Is he known to have changed his opinion as to the approaching disastrous event？
So long as there were any persons made anxious by this prediction； so long as there was even one who believed that he； and his family； and his nation； and his race； and the home of mankind； with all its monuments； were very soon to be smitten in mid…heaven and instantly shivered into fragments； it was very desirable to find any evidence that this prophet of evil was a man who held many extravagant and even monstrous opinions。 Still more satisfactory would it be if it could be shown that he had reconsidered his predictions； and declared that he could not abide by his former alarming conclusions。 And we should think very ill of any astronomer who would not rejoice for the sake of his fellow…creatures； if not for his own； to find the threatening presage invalidated in either or both of the ways just mentioned； even though he had committed himself to M。 Babinet's dire belief。
But what is the trivial； temporal accident of the wiping out of a planet and its inhabitants to the infinite catastrophe which shall establish a mighty world of eternal despair？ And which is it most desirable for mankind to have disproved or weakened； the grounds of the threat of M。 Babinet； or those of the other infinitely more terrible comminations； so far as they rest on the authority of Jonathan Edwards？
The writer of this paper had been long engaged in the study of the writings of Edwards； with reference to the essay he had in contemplation； when； on speaking of the subject to a very distinguished orthodox divine； this gentleman mentioned the existence of a manuscript of Edwards which had been held back from the public on account of some opinions or tendencies it contained； or was suspected of containing 〃High Arianism〃 was the exact expression he used with reference to it。 On relating this fact to an illustrious man of science； whose name is best known to botanists； but is justly held in great honor by the orthodox body to which he belongs； it appeared that he； too； had heard of such a manuscript； and the questionable doctrine associated with it in his memory was Sabellianism。 It was of course proper in the writer of an essay on Jonathan Edwards to mention the alleged existence of such a manuscript； with reference to which the same caution seemed to have been exercised as that which led； the editor of his collected works to suppress the language Edwards had used about children。
This mention led to a friendly correspondence between the writer and one of the professors in the theological school at Andover； and finally to the publication of a brief essay； which； for some reason； had been withheld from publication for more than a century。 Its title is 〃Observations concerning the Scripture OEconomy of the Trinity and Covenant of Redemption。 By Jonathan Edwards。〃 It contains thirty…six pages and a half； each small page having about two hundred words。 The pages before the reader will be found to average about three hundred and twenty…five words。 An introduction and an appendix by the editor； Professor Egbert C。 Smyth； swell the contents to nearly a hundred pages； but these additions； and the circumstance that it is bound in boards； must not lead us to overlook the fact that the little volume is nothing more than a pamphlet in book's clothing。
A most extraordinary performance it certainly is； dealing with the arrangements entered into by the three persons of the Trinity； in as bald and matter…of…fact language and as commercial a spirit as if the author had been handling the adjustment of a limited partnership between three retail tradesmen。 But； lest a layman's judgment might be considered insufficient； the treatise was submitted by the writer to one of the most learned of our theological experts；the same who once informed a church dignitary； who had been attempting to define his theological position； that he was a Eutychian；a fact which he seems to have been no more aware of than M。 Jourdain was conscious that he had been speaking prose all his life。 The treatise appeared to this professor anti…trinitarian； not in the direction of Unitarianism； however； but of Tritheism。 Its anthropomorphism affected him like blasphemy； and the paper produced in him the sense of 〃great disgust；〃 which its whole character might well excite in the unlearned reader。
All this is； however； of little importance； for this is not the work of Edwards referred to by the present writer in his previous essay。 The tract recently printed as a volume may be the one referred to by Dr。 Bushnell； in 1851； but of this reference by him the writer never heard until after his own essay was already printed。 The manuscript of the 〃Observations〃 was received by Professor Smyth； as he tells us in his introduction； about fifteen years ago； from the late Reverend William T。 Dwight； D。 D。； to whom it was bequeathed by his brother； the Reverend Dr。 Sereno E。 Dwight。
But the reference of the present writer was to another production of the great logician； thus spoken of in a quotation from 〃the accomplished editor of the Hartford 'Courant；'〃 to be found in Professor Smyth's introduction ：
〃It has long been a matter of private information that Professor Edwards A。 Park； of Andover； had in his possession an published manuscript of Edwards of considerable extent； perhaps two thirds as long as his treatise on the will。 As few have ever seen the manuscript； its contents are only known by vague reports。。。。 It is said that it contains a departure from his published views on the Trinity and a modification of the view of original sin。 One account of it says that the manuscript leans toward Sabellianism； and that it even approaches Pelagianism。〃
It was to this 〃suppressed〃 manuscript the present writer referred； and not to the slender brochure recently given to the public。 He is bound； therefore； to say plainly that to satisfy inquirers who may be still in doubt with reference to Edwards's theological views； it would be necessary to submit this manuscript； and all manuscripts of his which have been kept private； to their inspection； in print； if possible； so that all could form their own opinion about it or them。
The whole matter may be briefly stated thus： Edwards believed in an eternity of unimaginable horrors for 〃the bulk of mankind。〃 His authority counts with many in favor of that belief； which affects great numbers as the idea of ghosts affected Madame de Stall： 〃Je n'y crois pas； mais je les crains。〃 This belief is one which it is