按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
s bite their thumbs at each other in the open square； but Hamlet came out of his soul； and Romeo out of his passion。 They were elements of his nature to which he gave visible form； impulses that stirred so strongly within him that he had； as it were perforce； to suffer them to realise their energy； not on the lower plane of actual life； where they would have been trammelled and constrained and so made imperfect； but on that imaginative plane of art where Love can indeed find in Death its rich fulfilment； where one can stab the eavesdropper behind the arras； and wrestle in a new…made grave； and make a guilty king drink his own hurt； and see one's father's spirit； beneath the glimpses of the moon； stalking in complete steel from misty wall to wall。 Action being limited would have left Shakespeare unsatisfied and unexpressed； and； just as it is because he did nothing that he has been able to achieve everything； so it is because he never speaks to us of himself in his plays that his plays reveal him to us absolutely； and show us his true nature and temperament far more completely than do those strange and exquisite sonnets； even； in which he bares to crystal eyes the secret closet of his heart。 Yes； the objective form is the most subjective in matter。 Man is least himself when he talks in his own person。 Give him a mask； and he will tell you the truth。
ERNEST。 The critic； then； being limited to the subjective form； will necessarily be less able fully to express himself than the artist； who has always at his disposal the forms that are impersonal and objective。
GILBERT。 Not necessarily； and certainly not at all if he recognises that each mode of criticism is； in its highest development； simply a mood； and that we are never more true to ourselves than when we are inconsistent。 The aesthetic critic； constant only to the principle of beauty in all things； will ever be looking for fresh impressions； winning from the various schools the secret of their charm； bowing； it may be； before foreign altars； or smiling； if it be his fancy； at strange new gods。 What other people call one's past has； no doubt； everything to do with them； but has absolutely nothing to do with oneself。 The man who regards his past is a man who deserves to have no future to look forward to。 When one has found expression for a mood； one has done with it。 You laugh； but believe me it is so。 Yesterday it was Realism that charmed one。 One gained from it that NOUVEAU FRISSON which it was its aim to produce。 One analysed it； explained it； and wearied of it。 At sunset came the LUMINISTE in painting； and the SYMBOLISTE in poetry； and the spirit of mediaevalism； that spirit which belongs not to time but to temperament； woke suddenly in wounded Russia； and stirred us for a moment by the terrible fascination of pain。 To…day the cry is for Romance； and already the leaves are tremulous in the valley； and on the purple hill…tops walks Beauty with slim gilded feet。 The old modes of creation linger； of course。 The artists reproduce either themselves or each other； with wearisome iteration。 But Criticism is always moving on； and the critic is always developing。
Nor； again； is the critic really limited to the subjective form of expression。 The method of the drama is his； as well as the method of the epos。 He may use dialogue； as he did who set Milton talking to Marvel on the nature of comedy and tragedy； and made Sidney and Lord Brooke discourse on letters beneath the Penshurst oaks； or adopt narration； as Mr。 Pater is fond of doing； each of whose Imaginary Portraits … is not that the title of the book？ … presents to us； under the fanciful guise of fiction； some fine and exquisite piece of criticism； one on the painter Watteau； another on the philosophy of Spinoza； a third on the Pagan elements of the early Renaissance； and the last； and in some respects the most suggestive； on the source of that Aufklarung； that enlightening which dawned on Germany in the last century； and to which our own culture owes so great a debt。 Dialogue； certainly； that wonderful literary form which； from Plato to Lucian； and from Lucian to Giordano Bruno； and from Bruno to that grand old Pagan in whom Carlyle took such delight； the creative critics of the world have always employed； can never lose for the thinker its attraction as a mode of expression。 By its means he can both reveal and conceal himself； and give form to every fancy； and reality to every mood。 By its means he can exhibit the object from each point of view； and show it to us in the round； as a sculptor shows us things； gaining in this manner all the richness and reality of effect that comes from those side issues that are suddenly suggested by the central idea in its progress； and really illumine the idea more completely； or from those felicitous after…thoughts that give a fuller completeness to the central scheme； and yet convey something of the delicate charm of chance。
ERNEST。 By its means； too； he can invent an imaginary antagonist； and convert him when he chooses by some absurdly sophistical argument。
GILBERT。 Ah！ it is so easy to convert others。 It is so difficult to convert oneself。 To arrive at what one really believes； one must speak through lips different from one's own。 To know the truth one must imagine myriads of falsehoods。 For what is Truth？ In matters of religion； it is simply the opinion that has survived。 In matters of science； it is the ultimate sensation。 In matters of art； it is one's last mood。 And you see now； Ernest； that the critic has at his disposal as many objective forms of expression as the artist has。 Ruskin put his criticism into imaginative prose； and is superb in his changes and contradictions； and Browning put his into blank verse and made painter and poet yield us their secret； and M。 Renan uses dialogue； and Mr。 Pater fiction； and Rossetti translated into sonnet…music the colour of Giorgione and the design of Ingres； and his own design and colour also； feeling； with the instinct of one who had many modes of utterance； that the ultimate art is literature； and the finest and fullest medium that of words。
ERNEST。 Well； now that you have settled that the critic has at his disposal all objective forms； I wish you would tell me what are the qualities that should characterise the true critic。
GILBERT。 What would you say they were？
ERNEST。 Well； I should say that a critic should above all things be fair。
GILBERT。 Ah！ not fair。 A critic cannot be fair in the ordinary sense of the word。 It is only about things that do not interest one that one can give a really unbiassed opinion； which is no doubt the reason why an unbiassed opinion is always absolutely valueless。 The man who sees both sides of a question； is a man who sees absolutely nothing at all。 Art is a passion； and； in matters of art； Thought is inevitably coloured by emotion； and so is fluid rather than fixed； and； depending upon fine moods and exquisite moments； cannot be narrowed into the rigidity of a scientific formula or a theological dogma。 It is to the soul that Art speaks； and the soul may be made the prisoner of the mind as well as of the body。 One should； of course； have no prejudice