按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
to Christianity was actually their chief compliment to themselves；
and there seemed to be a strange unfairness about all their relative
insistence on the two things。 When considering some pagan or agnostic；
we were to remember that all men had one religion； when considering
some mystic or spiritualist； we were only to consider what absurd
religions some men had。 We could trust the ethics of Epictetus；
because ethics had never changed。 We must not trust the ethics
of Bossuet； because ethics had changed。 They changed in two
hundred years； but not in two thousand。
This began to be alarming。 It looked not so much as if
Christianity was bad enough to include any vices； but rather
as if any stick was good enough to beat Christianity with。
What again could this astonishing thing be like which people
were so anxious to contradict； that in doing so they did not mind
contradicting themselves？ I saw the same thing on every side。
I can give no further space to this discussion of it in detail；
but lest any one supposes that I have unfairly selected three
accidental cases I will run briefly through a few others。
Thus； certain sceptics wrote that the great crime of Christianity
had been its attack on the family； it had dragged women to the
loneliness and contemplation of the cloister； away from their homes
and their children。 But； then； other sceptics （slightly more advanced）
said that the great crime of Christianity was forcing the family
and marriage upon us； that it doomed women to the drudgery of their
homes and children； and forbade them loneliness and contemplation。
The charge was actually reversed。 Or； again； certain phrases in the
Epistles or the marriage service； were said by the anti…Christians
to show contempt for woman's intellect。 But I found that the
anti…Christians themselves had a contempt for woman's intellect；
for it was their great sneer at the Church on the Continent that
〃only women〃 went to it。 Or again； Christianity was reproached
with its naked and hungry habits； with its sackcloth and dried peas。
But the next minute Christianity was being reproached with its pomp
and its ritualism； its shrines of porphyry and its robes of gold。
It was abused for being too plain and for being too coloured。
Again Christianity had always been accused of restraining sexuality
too much； when Bradlaugh the Malthusian discovered that it restrained
it too little。 It is often accused in the same breath of prim
respectability and of religious extravagance。 Between the covers
of the same atheistic pamphlet I have found the faith rebuked
for its disunion； 〃One thinks one thing； and one another；〃
and rebuked also for its union； 〃It is difference of opinion
that prevents the world from going to the dogs。〃 In the same
conversation a free…thinker； a friend of mine； blamed Christianity
for despising Jews； and then despised it himself for being Jewish。
I wished to be quite fair then； and I wish to be quite fair now；
and I did not conclude that the attack on Christianity was all wrong。
I only concluded that if Christianity was wrong； it was very
wrong indeed。 Such hostile horrors might be combined in one thing；
but that thing must be very strange and solitary。 There are men
who are misers； and also spendthrifts； but they are rare。 There are
men sensual and also ascetic； but they are rare。 But if this mass
of mad contradictions really existed； quakerish and bloodthirsty；
too gorgeous and too thread…bare； austere； yet pandering preposterously
to the lust of the eye； the enemy of women and their foolish refuge；
a solemn pessimist and a silly optimist； if this evil existed；
then there was in this evil something quite supreme and unique。
For I found in my rationalist teachers no explanation of such
exceptional corruption。 Christianity （theoretically speaking）
was in their eyes only one of the ordinary myths and errors of mortals。
THEY gave me no key to this twisted and unnatural badness。
Such a paradox of evil rose to the stature of the supernatural。
It was； indeed； almost as supernatural as the infallibility of the Pope。
An historic institution； which never went right； is really quite
as much of a miracle as an institution that cannot go wrong。
The only explanation which immediately occurred to my mind was that
Christianity did not come from heaven； but from hell。 Really； if Jesus
of Nazareth was not Christ； He must have been Antichrist。
And then in a quiet hour a strange thought struck me like a still
thunderbolt。 There had suddenly come into my mind another explanation。
Suppose we heard an unknown man spoken of by many men。 Suppose we
were puzzled to hear that some men said he was too tall and some
too short； some objected to his fatness； some lamented his leanness；
some thought him too dark； and some too fair。 One explanation （as
has been already admitted） would be that he might be an odd shape。
But there is another explanation。 He might be the right shape。
Outrageously tall men might feel him to be short。 Very short men
might feel him to be tall。 Old bucks who are growing stout might
consider him insufficiently filled out； old beaux who were growing
thin might feel that he expanded beyond the narrow lines of elegance。
Perhaps Swedes （who have pale hair like tow） called him a dark man；
while negroes considered him distinctly blonde。 Perhaps （in short）
this extraordinary thing is really the ordinary thing； at least
the normal thing； the centre。 Perhaps； after all； it is Christianity
that is sane and all its critics that are madin various ways。
I tested this idea by asking myself whether there was about any
of the accusers anything morbid that might explain the accusation。
I was startled to find that this key fitted a lock。 For instance；
it was certainly odd that the modern world charged Christianity
at once with bodily austerity and with artistic pomp。 But then
it was also odd； very odd； that the modern world itself combined
extreme bodily luxury with an extreme absence of artistic pomp。
The modern man thought Becket's robes too rich and his meals too poor。
But then the modern man was really exceptional in history； no man before
ever ate such elaborate dinners in such ugly clothes。 The modern man
found the church too simple exactly where modern life is too complex；
he found the church too gorgeous exactly where modern life is too dingy。
The man who disliked the plain fasts and feasts was mad on entrees。
The man who disliked vestments wore a pair of preposterous trousers。
And s