友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
飞读中文网 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

meteorology-第26章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!





principle。 Let B be the outer rainbow; A the inner one; let R stand



for the red colour; G for green; V for violet; yellow appears at the



point Y。 Three rainbows or more are not found because even the



second is fainter; so that the third reflection can have no strength



whatever and cannot reach the sun at all。 (See diagram。)







                                 5







  The rainbow can never be a circle nor a segment of a circle



greater than a semicircle。 The consideration of the diagram will prove



this and the other properties of the rainbow。 (See diagram。)



  Let A be a hemisphere resting on the circle of the horizon; let



its centre be K and let H be another point appearing on the horizon。



Then; if the lines that fall in a cone from K have HK as their axis;



and; K and M being joined; the lines KM are reflected from the



hemisphere to H over the greater angle; the lines from K will fall



on the circumference of a circle。 If the reflection takes place when



the luminous body is rising or setting the segment of the circle above



the earth which is cut off by the horizon will be a semi…circle; if



the luminous body is above the horizon it will always be less than a



semicircle; and it will be smallest when the luminous body culminates。



First let the luminous body be appearing on the horizon at the point



H; and let KM be reflected to H; and let the plane in which A is;



determined by the triangle HKM; be produced。 Then the section of the



sphere will be a great circle。 Let it be A (for it makes no difference



which of the planes passing through the line HK and determined by



the triangle KMH is produced)。 Now the lines drawn from H and K to a



point on the semicircle A are in a certain ratio to one another; and



no lines drawn from the same points to another point on that



semicircle can have the same ratio。 For since both the points H and



K and the line KH are given; the line MH will be given too;



consequently the ratio of the line MH to the line MK will be given



too。 So M will touch a given circumference。 Let this be NM。 Then the



intersection of the circumferences is given; and the same ratio cannot



hold between lines in the same plane drawn from the same points to any



other circumference but MN。



  Draw a line DB outside of the figure and divide it so that



D:B=MH:MK。 But MH is greater than MK since the reflection of the



cone is over the greater angle (for it subtends the greater angle of



the triangle KMH)。 Therefore D is greater than B。 Then add to B a line



Z such that B+Z:D=D:B。 Then make another line having the same ratio to



B as KH has to Z; and join MI。



  Then I is the pole of the circle on which the lines from K fall。 For



the ratio of D to IM is the same as that of Z to KH and of B to KI。 If



not; let D be in the same ratio to a line indifferently lesser or



greater than IM; and let this line be IP。 Then HK and KI and IP will



have the same ratios to one another as Z; B; and D。 But the ratios



between Z; B; and D were such that Z+B:D=D: B。 Therefore



IH:IP=IP:IK。 Now; if the points K; H be joined with the point P by the



lines HP; KP; these lines will be to one another as IH is to IP; for



the sides of the triangles HIP; KPI about the angle I are



homologous。 Therefore; HP too will be to KP as HI is to IP。 But this



is also the ratio of MH to MK; for the ratio both of HI to IP and of



MH to MK is the same as that of D to B。 Therefore; from the points



H; K there will have been drawn lines with the same ratio to one



another; not only to the circumference MN but to another point as



well; which is impossible。 Since then D cannot bear that ratio to



any line either lesser or greater than IM (the proof being in either



case the same); it follows that it must stand in that ratio to MI



itself。 Therefore as MI is to IK so IH will be to MI and finally MH to



MK。



  If; then; a circle be described with I as pole at the distance MI it



will touch all the angles which the lines from H and K make by their



reflection。 If not; it can be shown; as before; that lines drawn to



different points in the semicircle will have the same ratio to one



another; which was impossible。 If; then; the semicircle A be



revolved about the diameter HKI; the lines reflected from the points



H; K at the point M will have the same ratio; and will make the



angle KMH equal; in every plane。 Further; the angle which HM and MI



make with HI will always be the same。 So there are a number of



triangles on HI and KI equal to the triangles HMI and KMI。 Their



perpendiculars will fall on HI at the same point and will be equal。



Let O be the point on which they fall。 Then O is the centre of the



circle; half of which; MN; is cut off by the horizon。 (See diagram。)



  Next let the horizon be ABG but let H have risen above the



horizon。 Let the axis now be HI。 The proof will be the same for the



rest as before; but the pole I of the circle will be below the horizon



AG since the point H has risen above the horizon。 But the pole; and



the centre of the circle; and the centre of that circle (namely HI)



which now determines the position of the sun are on the same line。 But



since KH lies above the diameter AG; the centre will be at O on the



line KI below the plane of the circle AG determined the position of



the sun before。 So the segment YX which is above the horizon will be



less than a semicircle。 For YXM was a semicircle and it has now been



cut off by the horizon AG。 So part of it; YM; will be invisible when



the sun has risen above the horizon; and the segment visible will be



smallest when the sun is on the meridian; for the higher H is the



lower the pole and the centre of the circle will be。



  In the shorter days after the autumn equinox there may be a



rainbow at any time of the day; but in the longer days from the spring



to the autumn equinox there cannot be a rainbow about midday。 The



reason for this is that when the sun is north of the equator the



visible arcs of its course are all greater than a semicircle; and go



on increasing; while the invisible arc is small; but when the sun is



south of the equator the visible arc is small and the invisible arc



great; and the farther the sun moves south of the equator the



greater is the invisible arc。 Consequently; in the days near the



summer solstice; the size of the visible arc is such that before the



point H reaches the middle of that arc; that is its point of



culmination; the point is well below the horizon; the reason for



this being the great size of the visible arc; and the consequent



distance of the point of culmination from the earth。 But in the days



near the winter solstice the visible arcs are small; and the



contrary is necessarily the case: for the sun is on the meridian



before the point H has risen far。







                                 6







  M
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!