友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
飞读中文网 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

history of philosophy-第58章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



special pocket; and seeing; willing; &c。; in others。 But if I say ‘I see;’ ‘I walk out;’ there is
present on the one hand my consciousness ‘I;’ and consequently thought; on the other hand;
however; there is present willing; seeing; hearing; walking; and thus a still further modification of
the content。 Now because of this modification I cannot say ‘I walk; and therefore I am;’ for I
can undoubtedly abstract from the modification; since it is no longer universal Thought。 Thus we
must merely look at the pure consciousness contained in the concrete ‘I。’ Only when I
accentuate the fact that I am present there as thinking; is pure Being implied; for only with the
universal is Being united。

“In this it is implied;” says Descartes; “that thought is more certain to me than body。 If from the
fact that I touch or see the earth I judge that it exists; I must more certainly judge from this that my
thought exists。 For it may very well happen that I judge the earth to exist; even if it does not exist;
but it cannot be that I judge this; and that my mind which judges this does not exist。” (10) That is
to say; everything which is for me I may assert to be non…existent; but when I assert myself to be
non…existent; I myself assert; or it is my judgment。 For I cannot set aside the fact that I judge;
even if I can abstract from that respecting which I judge。 In this Philosophy has regained its own
ground that thought starts from thought as what is certain in itself; and not from something external;
not from something given; not from an authority; but directly from the freedom that is contained in
the ‘I think。’ Of all else I may doubt; of the existence of bodily things; of my body itself; or this
certainty does not possess immediacy in itself。 For ‘I’ is just certainty itself; but in all else this
certainty is only predicate; my body is certain to me; it is not this certainty itself。 (11) As against
the certainty we feel of having a body; Descartes adduces the empirical phenomenon that we often
hear of persons imagining they feel pain in a limb which they have lost long ago。 (12) What is
actual; he says is a substance; the soul is a thinking substance; it is thus for itself; separate from all
external material things and independent。 That it is thinking is evident from its nature: it would think
and exist even if no material things were present; the soul can hence know itself more easily than
its body: (13)

All else that we can hold as true rests on this certainty; for in order that anything should be held as
true; evidence is requisite; but nothing is true which has not this inward evidence in consciousness。
“Now the evidence of everything rests upon our perceiving it as clearly and vividly as that certainty
itself; and on its so entirely depending from; and harmonizing with this principle; that if we wished
to doubt it we should also have to doubt this principle likewise” (our ego)。 (14) This knowledge
is indeed on its own account perfect evidence; but it is not yet the truth; or if we take that Being as
truth; it is an empty content; and it is with the content that we have to do。

c。 What comes third is thus the transition of this certainty into truth; into the determinate;
Descartes again makes this transition in a na?ve way; and with it we for the first time begin to
consider his metaphysics。 What here takes place is that an interest arises in further representations
and conceptions of the abstract unity of Being and Thought; there Descartes sets to work in an
externally reflective manner。 “The consciousness which merely knows itself to be certain now
however seeks to extend its knowledge; and finds that it has conceptions of many things — in
which conceptions it does not deceive itself; so long as it does not assert or deny that something
similar outside corresponds to them。” Deception in the conceptions has meaning only in relation
to external existence。 “Consciousness also discovers universal conceptions; and obtains from them
proofs which are evident; e。g。 the geometric proposition that the three angles of a triangle are
together equal to two right angles is a conception which follows incontrovertibly from others。 But
in reflecting whether such things really exist doubts arise。” (15) That there is such a thing as a
triangle is indeed in this case by no means certain; since extension is not contained in the immediate
certainty of myself。 The soul may exist without the bodily element; and this last without it; they are
in reality different; one is conceivable without the other。 The soul thus does not think and know the
other as clearly as the certainty of itself。 (16)

Now the truth of all knowledge rests on the proof of the existence of God。 The soul is an
imperfect substance; but it has the Idea of an absolute perfect existence within itself; this perfection
is not begotten in itself; just because it is an imperfect substance; this Idea is thus innate。 In
Descartes the consciousness of this fact is expressed by his saying that as long as the existence of
God is not proved and perceived the possibility of our deceiving ourselves remains; because we
cannot know whether we do not possess a nature ordered and disposed to err (supra; p。 226)。
(17) The form is rather a mistaken one; and it only generally expresses the opposition in which
self…consciousness stands to the consciousness of what is different; of the objective; and we have
to deal with the unity of both — the question being whether what is in thought likewise possesses
objectivity。 This unity rests in God or is God Himself。 I shall put these assertions in the manner of
Descartes: “Amongst these various conceptions possessed by us there likewise is the conception
of a supremely intelligent; powerful; and absolutely perfect Being; and this is the most excellent of
all conceptions。” This all…embracing universal conception has therefore this distinguishing feature;
that in its case the uncertainty respecting Being which appears in the other conceptions; finds no
place。 It has the characteristic that “In it we do not recognize existence as something merely
possible and accidental; as we do the conceptions of other things which we perceive clearly; but
as a really essential and eternal determination。 For instance; as mind perceives that in the
conception of a triangle it is implied that the three angles are equal to two right angles; the triangle
has them; and in the same way from the fact that mind perceives existence to be necessarily and
eternally implied in the Notion of the most perfect reality; it is forced to conclude that the most
perfect reality exists。” (18) For to perfection there likewise pertains the determination of
existence; since the conception of a non…existent is less perfect。 Thus we there have the unity of
thought and Being; and the ontological proof of the existence of God; this we met with earlier (p。
63; seq。) in dealing with Anselm。

The proof of the existence of God from the Idea of Him is in this wise: In this Notion existence is
implied; and therefore it is true。 Descartes proceeds further in the same direction; in so far as after
the manner of empirical
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!