友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
飞读中文网 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

lect04-第3章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!









this sort is well known to the law of India as the Joint






Undivided Family; or; to give the technical description; the






Family; 'joint in food; worship; and estate。' If a Hindoo has






become the root of a family it is not necessarily separated by






his death; his children continue united for legal purposes as a






corporate brotherhood; and some definite act of one or more of






the brethren is required to effect a dissolution of the plexus of






mutual rights and a partition of the family property。 The family






thus formed by the continuance of several generations in union is






identical in outline with a group very familiar to the students






of the older Roman law  the Agnatic Kindred。 The Agnates were






that assemblage of persons who would have been under the






patriarchal authority of some common ancestor; if he had lived






long enough to exercise it。 The Joint Family of the Hindoos is






that assemblage of persons who would have joined in the






sacrifices at the funeral of some common ancestor; if he had died






in their lifetime。 In the last case the sacerdotal point of view






merely takes the place of the legal or civil。






    So far as we are able; amid the disadvantages under which we






are placed by the obscurity of our authorities; let us examine






the legal qualities which the ancient Irish law attributes to






this brotherhood of kinsmen as it was found in Ireland。 First of






all; the 'Tribe' of the Brehon tracts is a corporate; organic;






self…sustaining unit。 'The Tribe sustains itself。' ('Ancient Laws






of Ireland;' ii。 283。) Its continuity has begun to depend on the






land which it occupies  'land;' says one of the still






unpublished tracts; 'is perpetual man'  but it is not a purely






land…owning body; it has 'live chattels and dead chattels;'






distinguished from those of individual tribesmen。 ('Ancient Laws






of Ireland;' ii。 289。) Nor is it a purely cultivating body; it






may follow a professional calling。 (Ibid。; iii。 49…51。) A portion






of the tribal domain; probably the arable and choice pasture






lands; has been allotted to separate households of tribesmen; but






they hold their allotments subject to the controlling rights of






the entire brotherhood; and the primary or fundamental rule is






that they are to keep their shares of tribe…land intact。 'Every






tribesman is able to keep his tribe…land; he is not to sell it or






alienate or conceal it; or give it to pay for crimes or






contracts。' ('Ancient Laws of Ireland;' ii。 283。) 'No person






should leave a rent upon his land or upon his tribe which he did






not find upon it。' (Ibid。; iii。 52; 53。) 'Everyone is wealthy who






keeps his tribe…land perfect as he got it; who does not leave






greater debt upon it than he found on it。' (Ibid。; iii。 55。)






    Under certain circumstances the tribesman may alienate; by






grant; contract; or bequest; a certain quantity of the tribe…land






allotted to him; but what are the circumstances; and what the






quantity; are points on which we cannot venture to make any






precise statement; so obscure and contradictory are the rules set






forth。 But the grantee primarily contemplated is certainly the






Church; though it seems clear that there is a general power of






alienation; either with the consent of the entire tribal






brotherhood or under pressure of strong necessity。 It further






appears to be beyond question that the tribesman has considerably






greater power of disposition over property which he has acquired






than over property which has devolved on him as a member of a






tribe; and that he has more power over acquisitions made by his






own unaided industry than over acquisitions made through profits






arising from the cultivation of tribal land。 'No person should






grant land except such as he has purchased himself; unless by the






common consent of the tribe。 ('Ancient Laws of Ireland;' iii。 52;






53。) 'He who has not sold or bought (i。e。; he who keeps his






tribeland as he obtained it) is allowed to make grants; each






according to his dignity (i。e。; as the commentator explains; to






the extent of one…third or one…half of his tribe…land)。' 'He who






neither sells nor purchases may give as far as the third of his






tribe…share in case of little necessity and one…half in case of






great necessity' ('Ancient Laws of Ireland;'iii。 47。) 'If it be






land that acquires it; it is one…half;。。。 if he be a professional






man; it is two…thirds of his contracts ' (iii。 49)。






    The distinction between acquired property and property






inherited or received from kinsmen; and the enlarged power of






parting with the first; are found in many bodies of ancient law






 in our own early law among others。 The rule that alienations;






otherwise unlawful; may be made under pressure of necessity; is






found in many parts of Hindoo law。 The rule requiring the consent






of the collective brotherhood to alienations; with many minor






rules of this part of Brehon law; constantly forms part of the






customs of Indian and Russian village…communities; and the duty






of following common practices of tillage; which is the bequest






from these communities which lasted longest in the Germanic






countries; is classed by the Corus Bescna; along with Marriage;






as one of the fundamental institutions of the irish people。






('Ancient Laws of Ireland;' iii。 17。) But much the most striking






and unexpected analogies in the Brehon law on the subject of






Tribesmen and the Tribe are those which it has with the Hindoo






law of Joint Undivided Families。 Under the Brahminical Indian






law; whenever a member of a joint family has acquired property






through special scientific knowledge or the practice of a liberal






art; he does not bring it into the common fund; unless his






accomplishments were obtained through a training given to him by






his family or at their expense。 The whole law on the subject was






much considered in a strange case which arose before the High






Court of Madras ('Madras High Court Reports;' ii。 56); where a






joint family claimed the gains of a dancing…girl。 The decision of






the Court is thus summarised by the Reporter: 'The ordinary gains






of science are divisible (i。e。; they are brought into hotc
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!