the origin of the distinction of ranks-第7章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！


n　digging　roots；　in　drawing　water；　in　carrying　wood；　in　milking　the　cattle；　in　dressing　the　victuals；　in　rearing　the　children；　and　in　those　other　kinds　of　work　which　their　situation　has　taught　them　to　perform。　The　husband；　when　he　is　not　engaged　in　some　warlike　exercise；　indulges　himself　in　idleness；　and　devolves　upon　his　wife　the　whole　burden　of　his　domestic　affairs。　He　disdains　to　assist　her　in　these　employments：　she　sleeps　in　a　different　bed；　and　is　seldom　permitted　to　have　any　conversation　or　correspondence　with　him。　　　　　Among　the　negroes　upon　the　slave…coast；　the　wife　is　never　allowed　to　appear　before　the　husband；　or　to　receive　any　thing　from　his　hands；　without　putting　herself　into　a　kneeling　posture。　　　　　In　the　empire　of　Congo；　and　in　the　greater　part　of　those　nations　which　inhabit　the　southern　coast　of　Africa；　the　women　of　a　family　are　seldom　allowed　to　eat　with　the　men。　The　husband　sits　alone　at　table；　and　the　wife　commonly　stands　at　his　back；　to　guard　him　from　the　flies；　to　serve　him　with　his　victuals；　or　to　furnish　him　with　his　pipe　and　his　tobacco。　After　he　has　finished　his　meal；　she　is　allowed　to　eat　what　remains；　but　without　sitting　down；　which　it　seems　would　be　inconsistent　with　the　inferiority　and　submission　that　is　thought　suitable　to　her　sex。　When　a　Hottentot　and　his　wife　have　come　into　the　service　of　a　European；　and　are　entertained　in　the　same　house；　the　master　is　under　the　necessity　of　allotting　to　each　of　them　a　distinct　portion　of　victuals；　which；　out　of　regard　to　the　general　usage　of　their　country；　they　always　devour　at　a　distance　from　one　another。　　　　　In　the　account　lately　given　by　Commodore　Byron　of　the　Indians　of　South　America；　we　are　told；　that：　the　men　exercise　a　most　despotic　authority　over　their　wives；　whom　they　consider　in　the　same　view　they　do　any　other　part　of　their　property；　and　dispose　of　them　accordingly：　even　their　common　treatment　of　them　is　cruel；　for　though　the　toil　and　hazard　of　procuring　food　lies　entirely　upon　the　women；　yet　they　are　not　suffered　to　touch　any　part　of　it　till　the　husband　is　satisfied；　and　then　he　assigns　them　their　portion；　which　is　generally　very　scanty；　and　such　as　he　has　not　a　stomach　for　himself。　　　　　The　same　author　informs　us；　that　he　observed　a　like　arbitrary　behaviour　in　many　other　nations　of　savages　with　whom　he　has　since　become　acquainted。（12*）　　　　　From　the　servile　condition　of　the　women　in　barbarous　countries；　they　are　rendered　in　a　great　measure　incapable　of　property；　and　are　supposed　to　have　no　share　in　the　estate　of　that　particular　family　to　which　they　belong。　Whatever　has　been　acquired　by　their　labour　is　under　the　sole　administration　and　disposal　of　those　male　relations　and　friends；　by　whom　they　are　protected；　and　from　whom　they　receive　a　precarious　subsistence。　Upon　the　death　of　a　proprietor；　his　estate　is　continued　in　the　possession　of　his　sons；　or　transmitted　to　his　other　male　relations；　and　his　daughters　are　so　far　from　being　entitled　to　a　share　of　the　succession；　that　they　are　even　considered　as　a　part　of　the　inheritance；　which　the　heir　has　the　power　of　managing　at　pleasure。　　　　　At　the　Cape　of　Good　Hope；　in　the　kingdom　of　Benin；　and　in　general　upon　the　whole　southern　and　western　coast　of　Africa；　no　female　is　ever　admitted　to　the　succession　of　any　estate；　either　real　or　personal。　　　　　The　same　custom　is　said　to　be　observed　among　the　Tartars；　and　there　is　some　reason　to　believe　that　it　has　been　anciently　established　among　all　the　inhabitants　of　Chaldea　and　Arabia。　　　　　From　the　famous　decision　of　this　point　related　by　Moses；　it　appears　that；　in　his　time；　the　succession　of　females　had　been　without　a　precedent；　and；　by　his　appointment；　they　were　only　permitted　to　inherit　upon　a　failure　of　males　of　the　same　degree。　　　　　Then　came　the　daughters　of　Zelophehad　　and　they　stood　before　Moses；　and　before　Eleazar　the　priest；　and　before　the　princes；　and　all　the　congregation；　by　the　door　of　the　tabernacle　of　the　congregation；　saying：　　　　　Our　father　died　in　the　wilderness；　and　he　was　not　in　the　company　of　them　that　gathered　themselves　together　against　the　Lord　in　the　company　of　Korah；　but　died　in　his　own　sin；　and　had　no　sons。　　　　　Why　should　the　name　of　our　father　be　done　away　from　among　his　family；　because　he　hath　no　son？　Give　unto　us　therefore　a　possession　among　the　brethren　of　our　father。　　　　　And　Moses　brought　their　cause　before　the　Lord。　　　　　And　the　Lord　spake　unto　Moses；　saying：　　　　　The　daughters　of　Zelophehad　speak　right；　thou　shalt　surely　give　them　a　possession　of　an　inheritance　among　their　father's　brethren；　and　thou　shalt　cause　the　inheritance　of　their　father　to　pass　unto　them。　　　　　And　thou　shalt　speak　unto　the　children　of　Israel；　saying；　If　a　man　die；and　have　no　son；　then　ye　shall　cause　his　inheritance　to　pass　unto　his　daughter。（13*）　　　　　In　all　those　German　nations　which　over…ran　and　subdued　the　different　provinces　of　the　Roman　empire；　the　same　notions　were　entertained　concerning　the　inferiority　of　the　women；　and　the　same　rules　of　succession　were　naturally　introduced。　It　is　probable　that；　according　to　the　original　customs　which　prevailed　in　all　these　nations；　daughters；　and　all　other　female　relations；　were　entirely　excluded　from　the　right　of　inheritance；　but　that　afterwards；　when　the　increase　of　opulence　and　luxury　had　raised　them　to　higher　consideration；　they　were　admitted　to　succeed　after　the　males　of　the　same　degree。　　　　　In　a　country　where　the　women　are　universally　regarded　as　the　slaves　of　the　other　sex；　it　is　natural　to　expect　that　they　should　be　bought　and　sold；　like　any　other　species　of　property。　To　marry　a　wife　must　there　be　the　same　thing　as　to　purchase　a　female　servant；　who　is　to　be　entrusted；　under　the　husband's　direction；　with　a　great　part　of　the　domestic　economy。　　　　　Thus；　in　all　savage　nations；　whether　in　Asia；　Africa；　or　America；　the　wife　is　commonly　bought　by　the　husband　from　the　father；　or　those　other　relations　who　have　an　authority　over　her；　and　the　conclusion　of　a　bargain　of　this　nature；　together　with　the　payment　of　the　price；　has　therefore　become　the　most　usual　form　of　solemnity　in　the　celebration　of　their　marriages。（14*）　　　　　This　appears　to　be　the　real　foundation　of　what　is　related　by　historians；　that　in　some　parts　of　the　world　it　is　usual　for　the　husband　to　give　a　dowery　to　the　wife　or　her　relations；　instead　of　the　wife　bringing　along　with　her　a　dowery　to　the　husband。　　　　　'Dotem　non　uxor　marito；　sed　uxori　maritus　offert；'　is　the　expression　used　by　Tacitus　in　speaking　of　this　practice　among　the　ancient　German　nations。（15*）　　　　　When　Shechem　wanted　to　marry　the　daughter　of　Jacob　　'He　said　unto　her　father；　and　unto　her　brethren；　Let　me　find　grace　in　your　eyes；　and　what　ye　shall　say　unto　me　I　will　give。　　　　　'Ask　me　never　so　much　dowery　and　gift；　And　I　will　give　according　as　ye　shall　say　unto　me：　but　give　me　the　damsel　to　wife。'（16*）　　　　　When　David　married　the　daughter　of　king　Saul；　he　was　obliged　to　pay　a　dowery　of　a　very　singular　nature。（17*）　　　　　This　ancient　custom；　that　the　husband　should　buy　his　wife　from　her　relations；　remains　at　present　among　the　Chinese；　who；　notwithstanding　their　opulence；　and　their　improvement　in　arts；　are　still　so　wonderfully　tenacious　of　the　usages　introduced　in　a　barbarous　period。　　　　　Sir　Thomas　Smith　takes　notice；　that