按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
；〃 was his answer to Ptolemy when that ruler had questioned whether the Elements might not be simplified。 Doubtless this； like most similar good sayings； is apocryphal； but whoever invented it has made the world his debtor。
HEROPHILUS AND ERASISTRATUS The catholicity of Ptolemy's tastes led him； naturally enough； to cultivate the biological no less than the physical sciences。 In particular his influence permitted an epochal advance in the field of medicine。 Two anatomists became famous through the investigations they were permitted to make under the patronage of the enlightened ruler。 These earliest of really scientific investigators of the mechanism of the human body were named Herophilus and Erasistratus。 These two anatomists gained their knowledge by the dissection of human bodies （theirs are the first records that we have of such practices）； and King Ptolemy himself is said to have been present at some of these dissections。 They were the first to discover that the nerve… trunks have their origin in the brain and spinal cord； and they are credited also with the discovery that these nerve…trunks are of two different kindsone to convey motor； and the other sensory impulses。 They discovered； described； and named the coverings of the brain。 The name of Herophilus is still applied by anatomists； in honor of the discoverer； to one of the sinuses or large canals that convey the venous blood from the head。 Herophilus also noticed and described four cavities or ventricles in the brain； and reached the conclusion that one of these ventricles was the seat of the soula belief shared until comparatively recent times by many physiologists。 He made also a careful and fairly accurate study of the anatomy of the eye； a greatly improved the old operation for cataract。 With the increased knowledge of anatomy came also corresponding advances in surgery； and many experimental operations are said to have been performed upon condemned criminals who were handed over to the surgeons by the Ptolemies。 While many modern writers have attempted to discredit these assertions； it is not improbable that such operations were performed。 In an age when human life was held so cheap； and among a people accustomed to torturing condemned prisoners for comparatively slight offences； it is not unlikely that the surgeons were allowed to inflict perhaps less painful tortures in the cause of science。 Furthermore； we know that condemned criminals were sometimes handed over to the medical profession to be 〃operated upon and killed in whatever way they thought best〃 even as late as the sixteenth century。 Tertullian＇1＇ probably exaggerates； however； when he puts the number of such victims in Alexandria at six hundred。 Had Herophilus and Erasistratus been as happy in their deductions as to the functions of the organs as they were in their knowledge of anatomy； the science of medicine would have been placed upon a very high plane even in their time。 Unfortunately； however； they not only drew erroneous inferences as to the functions of the organs； but also disagreed radically as to what functions certain organs performed； and how diseases should be treated； even when agreeing perfectly on the subject of anatomy itself。 Their contribution to the knowledge of the scientific treatment of diseases holds no such place； therefore； as their anatomical investigations。 Half a century after the time of Herophilus there appeared a Greek physician； Heraclides； whose reputation in the use of drugs far surpasses that of the anatomists of the Alexandrian school。 His reputation has been handed down through the centuries as that of a physician； rather than a surgeon； although in his own time he was considered one of the great surgeons of the period。 Heraclides belonged to the 〃Empiric〃 school； which rejected anatomy as useless； depending entirely on the use of drugs。 He is thought to have been the first physician to point out the value of opium in certain painful diseases。 His prescription of this drug for certain cases of 〃sleeplessness； spasm； cholera； and colic；〃 shows that his use of it was not unlike that of the modern physician in certain cases； and his treatment of fevers； by keeping the patient's head cool and facilitating the secretions of the body； is still recognized as 〃good practice。〃 He advocated a free use of liquids in quenching the fever patient's thirsta recognized therapeutic measure to…day； but one that was widely condemned a century ago。
ARCHIMEDES OF SYRACUSE AND THE FOUNDATION OF MECHANICS We do not know just when Euclid died； but as he was at the height of his fame in the time of Ptolemy I。； whose reign ended in the year 285 B。C。； it is hardly probable that he was still living when a young man named Archimedes came to Alexandria to study。 Archimedes was born in the Greek colony of Syracuse； on the island of Sicily； in the year 287 B。C。 When he visited Alexandria he probably found Apollonius of Perga； the pupil of Euclid； at the head of the mathematical school there。 Just how long Archimedes remained at Alexandria is not known。 When he had satisfied his curiosity or completed his studies； he returned to Syracuse and spent his life there； chiefly under the patronage of King Hiero； who seems fully to have appreciated his abilities。 Archimedes was primarily a mathematician。 Left to his own devices； he would probably have devoted his entire time to the study of geometrical problems。 But King Hiero had discovered that his protege had wonderful mechanical ingenuity； and he made good use of this discovery。 Under stress of the king's urgings； the philosopher was led to invent a great variety of mechanical contrivances； some of them most curious ones。 Antiquity credited him with the invention of more than forty machines； and it is these； rather than his purely mathematical discoveries； that gave his name popular vogue both among his contemporaries and with posterity。 Every one has heard of the screw of Archimedes； through which the paradoxical effect was produced of making water seem to flow up hill。 The best idea of this curious mechanism is obtained if one will take in hand an ordinary corkscrew； and imagine this instrument to be changed into a hollow tube； retaining precisely the same shape but increased to some feet in length and to a proportionate diameter。 If one will hold the corkscrew in a slanting direction and turn it slowly to the right； supposing that the point dips up a portion of water each time it revolves； one can in imagination follow the flow of that portion of water from spiral to spiral； the water always running downward； of course； yet paradoxically being lifted higher and higher towards the base of the corkscrew； until finally it pours out （in the actual Archimedes' tube） at the top。 There is another form of the screw in which a revolving spiral blade operates within a cylinder； but the principle is precisely the same。 With either form water may be lifted； by the mere turning of the screw； to any desired height。 The ingenious mechanism excited the wonder of the contemporaries of Archimedes； as well it might。 More efficient devices have superseded it in modern times； but it still excites the admiration of all who examine it； and its effects seem as parad