友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
飞读中文网 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

what is property-第125章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!




It has been pretended that M。 Lamennais; preaching now a theocracy; now universal democracy; has been always consistent; that; under different names; he has sought invariably one and the same thing;unity。  Pitiful excuse for an author surprised in the very act of contradiction!  What would be thought of a man who; by turns a servant of despotism under Louis XVI; a demagogue with Robespierre; a courtier of the Emperor; a bigot during fifteen years of the Restoration; a conservative since 1830; should dare to say that he ever had wished for but one thing;public order?  Would he be regarded as any the less a renegade from all parties?  Public order; unity; the world's welfare; social harmony; the union of the nations;concerning each of these things there is no possible difference of opinion。  Everybody wishes them; the character of the publicist depends only upon the means by which he proposes to arrive at them。  But

why look to M。 Lamennais for a steadfastness of opinion; which he himself repudiates?  Has he not said; 〃The mind has no law; that which I believe to…day; I did not believe yesterday; I do not know that I shall believe it to…morrow〃?

No; there is no real superiority among men; since all talents and capacities are combined never in one individual。  This man has the power of thought; that one imagination and style; still another industrial and commercial capacity。  By our very nature and education; we possess only special aptitudes which are limited and confined; and which become consequently more necessary as they gain in depth and strength。  Capacities are to each other as functions and persons; who would dare to classify them in ranks?  The finest genius is; by the laws of his existence and development; the most dependent upon the society which creates him。  Who would dare to make a god of the glorious child?

〃It is not strength which makes the man;〃 said a Hercules of the market…place to the admiring crowd; 〃it is character。〃  That man; who had only his muscles; held force in contempt。  The lesson is a good one; proletaires; we should profit by it。  It is not talent (which is also a force); it is not knowledge; it is not beauty which makes the man。  It is heart; courage; will; virtue。  Now; if we are equal in that which makes us men; how can the accidental distribution of secondary faculties detract from our manhood?

Remember that privilege is naturally and inevitably the lot of the weak; and do not be misled by the fame which accompanies certain talents whose greatest merit consists in their rarity; and a long and toilsome apprenticeship。  It is easier for M。 Lamennais to recite a philippic; or sing a humanitarian ode after the Platonic fashion; than to discover a single useful truth; it is easier for an economist to apply the laws of production and distribution than to write ten lines in the style of M。 Lamennais; it is easier for both to speak than to act。  You; then; who put your hands to the work; who alone truly create; why do you wish me to admit your inferiority?  But; what am I saying?

Yes; you are inferior; for you lack virtue and will!  Ready for labor and for battle; you have; when liberty and equality are in question; neither courage nor character!

In the preface to his pamphlet on 〃Le Pays et le Gouvernement;〃 as well as in his defence before the jury; M。 Lamennais frankly declared himself an advocate of property。  Out of regard for the author and his misfortune; I shall abstain from characterizing this declaration; and from examining these two sorrowful performances。  M。 Lamennais seems to be only the tool of a quasi… radical party; which flatters him in order to use him; without respect for a glorious; but hence forth powerless; old age。  What means this profession of faith?  From the first number of 〃L'Avenir〃 to 〃L'Esquisse d'une Philosophie;〃 M。 Lamennais always favors equality; association; and even a sort of vague and indefinite communism。  M。 Lamennais; in recognizing the right of property; gives the lie to his past career; and renounces his most generous tendencies。  Can it; then; be true that in this man; who has been too roughly treated; but who is also too easily flattered; strength of talent has already outlived strength of will?

It is said that M。 Lamennais has rejected the offers of several of his friends to try to procure for him a commutation of his sentence。  M。 Lamennais prefers to serve out his time。  May not this affectation of a false stoicism come from the same source as his recognition of the right of property?  The Huron; when taken prisoner; hurls insults and threats at his conqueror;that is the heroism of the savage; the martyr prays for his executioners; and is willing to receive from them his life;that is the heroism of the Christian。  Why has the apostle of love become an apostle of anger and revenge?  Has; then; the translator of 〃L'Imitation〃 forgotten that he who offends charity cannot honor virtue?  Galileo; retracting on his knees before the tribunal of the inquisition his heresy in regard to the movement of the earth; and recovering at that price his liberty; seems to me a hundred times grander than M。 Lamennais。  What! if we suffer for truth and justice; must we; in retaliation; thrust our persecutors outside the pale of human society; and; when sentenced to an unjust punishment; must we decline exemption if it is offered to us; because it pleases a few base satellites to call it a pardon?  Such is not the wisdom of Christianity。  But I forgot that in the presence of M。 Lamennais this name is no longer pronounced。  May the prophet of 〃L'Avenir〃 be soon restored to liberty and his friends; but; above all; may he henceforth derive his inspiration only from his genius and his heart!

O proletaires; proletaires! how long are you to be victimized by this spirit of revenge and implacable hatred which your false friends kindle; and which; perhaps; has done more harm to the development of reformatory ideas than the corruption; ignorance; and malice of the government?  Believe me; at the present time everybody is to blame。  In fact; in intention; or in example; all are found wanting; and you have no right to accuse any one。  The king himself (God forgive me!  I do not like to justify a king);the king himself is; like his predecessors; only the personification of an idea; and an idea; proletaires; which possesses you yet。  His greatest wrong consists in wishing for its complete realization; while you wish it realized only partially;consequently; in being logical in his government; while you; in your complaints; are not at all so。  You clamor for a second regicide。  He that is without sin among you;let him cast at the prince of property the first stone!

How successful you would have been if; in order to influence men; you had appealed to the self…love of men;if; in order to alter the constitution and the law; you had placed yourselves within the constitution and the law!  Fifty thousand laws; they say; make up our political and civil codes。  Of these fifty thousand laws; twenty…five thousand are for you; twenty…five thousand against you。  Is it not clear that your duty is to oppose the former to the latter; and thus; by the argument of contradiction; d
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!