按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
distinct in meaning from privileges…proper； in the etymological sense。 The latter are casual
exceptions to reversal rules； the former； however； are only the crystallisation； as regulations； of
characteristics inherent in an essential branch of society itself owing to its nature as particular。
§ 253。
In the Corporation； the family has its stable basis in the sense that its livelihood is
assured there； conditionally upon capability； i。e。 it has a stable capital （see § 170）
— In addition； his nexus of capability and livelihood is a recognised fact； with he
result that the Corporation member needs no external marks beyond his own
membership as evidence of his skill and his regular income and subsistence； i。e。 as
evidence that he is a somebody。 It is also recognised that he belongs to a whole
which is itself an organ of the entire society； and that he is actively concerned in
promoting the comparatively disinterested end of this whole。 Thus he commands
the respect due to one in his social position。
Remark： The institution of Corporations corresponds； on account of its assurance of capital； to
the introduction of agriculture and private property in another sphere （see Remark to § 203）。
When complaints are made about the luxury of the business classes their passion for extravagance
— which have as their concomitant creation of a rabble of paupers （see § 244） — we must not
forget that besides its other causes （e。g。 increasing mechanisation of labour） this phenomenon has
an ethical ground； as was indicated above。 Unless he is a member of an authorised Corporation
（and it is only by being authorised that an association becomes a Corporation）； an individual is
without rank or dignity； his isolation reduces his business to re self…seeking； and his livelihood and
satisfaction become insecure。 Consequently； he has to try to gain recognition for himself by giving
external proofs of success in his business； and to these proofs no limits can be set。 He cannot live
in the manner of his class； for no class really exists for him； since in civil society it is only something
common to particular persons which really exists； i。e。 something legally constituted and recognised。
Hence he cannot achieve for himself a way of life proper to his class and less idiosyncratic。
Within the Corporation the help which poverty receives loses its accidental character and the
humiliation wrongfully associated with it。 The wealthy perform their duties to their fellow associates
and thus riches cease to inspire either pride or envy； pride in their owners； envy in others。 In these
conditions rectitude obtains its proper recognition and respect。
§ 254。
The so…called ‘natural’ right of exercising one’s skill and thereby earning what
there is to be earned is restricted within the Corporation only in so far as it is
therein made rational instead of natural。 That is to say； it becomes freed from
personal opinion and contingency； saved from endangering either the individual
workman or others； recognised； guaranteed； and at the same time elevated to
conscious effort for a common end。
§ 255。
As the family was the first； so the Corporation is the second ethical root of the
state； the one planted in civil society。 The former contains the moments of
subjective particularity and objective universality in a substantial unity。 But these
moments are sundered in civil society to begin with； on the one side there is the
particularity of need and satisfaction； reflected into itself； and on the other side
the universality of abstract rights。 In the Corporation these moments are united in
an inward fashion； so that in this union particular welfare is present as a right and
is actualised。
Remark： The sanctity of marriage and the dignity of Corporation membership are the two fixed
points round which the unorganised atoms of civil society revolve。
Addition： The consideration behind the abolition of Corporations in recent times is that the
individual should fend for himself。 But we may grant this and still hold that corporation membership
does not alter a man’s obligation to earn his living。 Under modem political conditions； the citizens
have only a restricted share in the public business of the state； yet it is essential to provide men —
ethical entities — with work of a public character over and above their private business。 This work
of a public character； which the modern state does not always provide； is found in the
Corporation。 We saw earlier ＇Addition to § 184＇ that in fending for himself a member of civil
society is also working for others。 But this unconscious compulsion is not enough； it is in the
Corporation that it first changes into a known and thoughtful ethical mode of life。 Of course
Corporations must fall under the higher surveillance of the state； because otherwise they would
ossify； build themselves in； and decline into a miserable system of castes。 In and by itself； however；
a Corporation is not a closed caste； its purpose is rather to bring an isolated trade into the social
order and elevate it to a sphere in which it gains strength and respect。
§ 256。
The end of the Corporation is restricted and finite； while the public authority was
an external organisation involving a separation and a merely relative identity of
controller and controlled The end of the former and the externality and relative
identity of the latter find their truth in the absolutely universal end and its absolute
actuality。 Hence the sphere of civil society passes over into the state。
Remark： The town is the seat of the civil life of business。 There reflection arises； turns in upon
itself； and pursues its atomising task； each man maintains himself in and through his relation to
others who； like himself； are persons possessed of rights。 The country； on the other hand； is the
seat of an ethical life resting on nature and the family。 Town and country thus constitute the two
moments； still ideal moments； whose true ground is the state； although it is from them that the state
springs。
The philosophic proof of the concept of the state is this development of ethical life from its
immediate phase through civil society； the phase of division； to the state； which then reveals itself
as the true ground of these phases。 A proof in philosophic science can only be a development of
this kind。
Since the state appears as a result in the advance of the philosophic concept through displaying
itself as the true ground ＇of the earlier phases＇； that show of mediation is now cancelled and the
state has become directly present before us。 Actually； therefore； the state as such is not so much
the result as the beginning。 It is within the state that the family is first developed into civil society；
and it is the Idea of the state itself which disrupts itself into these two moments。 Through the
development of civil society； the substance of ethical life acquires its infinite form； which contains in
itself these two moments： （1） infinite differentiation down to th