按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
Harlech'：
‘Vote for Sweater； Vote for Sweater！ Vote for Sweater； VOTE FOR SWEATER！ ‘He's the Man； who has a plan； To liberate and reinstate the workers！ ‘Men of Mugs'bro'； show your mettle； Let them see that you're in fettle！ Once for all this question settle Sweater shall Prevail！'
The carriage containing Sir Featherstone； Adam Sweater； and Rushton and Didlum was in the middle of the procession。 The banner and the torches were at the head； and the grandeur of the scene was heightened by four men who walked … two on each side of the carriage； burning green fire in frying pans。 As they passed by the Slave Market； a poor； shabbily dressed wretch whose boots were so worn and rotten that they were almost falling off his feet； climbed up a lamp…post； and taking off his cap waved it in the air and shrieked out： ‘Three Cheers for Sir Featherstone Blood； our future Prime Minister！'
The Philanthropists cheered themselves hoarse and finally took the horses out of the traces and harnessed themselves to the carriage instead。
‘'Ow much wages will Sir Featherstone get if 'e is made Prime Minister？' asked Harlow of another Philanthropist who was also pushing up behind the carriage。
‘Five thousand a year；' replied the other； who by some strange chance happened to know。 ‘That comes to a 'underd pounds a week。'
‘Little enough； too； for a man like 'im；' said Harlow。
‘You're right； mate；' said the other； with deep sympathy in his voice。 ‘Last time 'e 'eld office 'e was only in for five years； so 'e only made twenty…five thousand pounds out of it。 Of course 'e got a pension as well … two thousand a year for life； I think it is； but after all； what's that … for a man like 'im？'
‘Nothing；' replied Harlow； in a tone of commiseration； and Newman； who was also there； helping to drag the carriage； said that it ought to be at least double that amount。
However； they found some consolation in knowing that Sir Featherstone would not have to wait till he was seventy before he obtained his pension； he would get it directly he came out of office。
The following evening Barrington； Owen and a few others of the same way of thinking； who had subscribed enough money between them to purchase a lot of Socialist leaflets； employed themselves distributing them to the crowds at the Liberal and Tory meetings； and whilst they were doing this they frequently became involved in arguments with the supporters of the capitalist system。 In their attempts to persuade others to refrain from voting for either of the candidates； they were opposed even by some who professed to believe in Socialism； who said that as there was no better Socialist candidate the thing to do was to vote for the better of the two。 This was the view of Harlow and Easton； whom they met。 Harlow had a green ribbon in his buttonhole； but Easton wore D'Encloseland's colours。
One man said that if he had his way； all those who had votes should be compelled to record them … whether they liked it or not … or be disenfranchised！ Barrington asked him if he believed in Tarrif Reform。 The man said no。
‘Why not？' demanded Barrington。
The other replied that he opposed Tariff Reform because he believed it would ruin the country。 Barrington inquired if he were a supporter of Socialism。 The man said he was not； and when further questioned he said that he believed if it were ever adopted it would bring black ruin upon the country … he believed this because Mr Sweater had said so。 When Barrington asked him … supposing there were only two candidates； one a Socialist and the other a Tariff Reformer … how would he like to be compelled to vote for one of them； he was at a loss for an answer。
During the next few days the contest continued。 The hired orators continued to pour forth their streams of eloquence； and tons of literature flooded the town。 The walls were covered with huge posters： ‘Another Liberal Lie。' ‘Another Tory Fraud。'
Unconsciously each of these two parties put in some splendid work for Socialism； in so much that each of them thoroughly exposed the hypocrisy of the other。 If the people had only had the sense； they might have seen that the quarrel between the Liberal and Tory leaders was merely a quarrel between thieves over the spoil； but unfortunately most of the people had not the sense to perceive this。 They were blinded by bigoted devotion to their parties； and … inflamed with maniacal enthusiasm … thought of nothing but ‘carrying their flags to victory'。
At considerable danger to themselves； Barrington； Owen and the other Socialists continued to distribute their leaflets and to heckle the Liberal and Tory speakers。 They asked the Tories to explain the prevalence of unemployment and poverty in protected countries； like Germany and America； and at Sweater's meetings they requested to be informed what was the Liberal remedy for unemployment。 From both parties the Socialists obtained the same kinds of answer … threats of violence and requests ‘not to disturb the meeting'。
These Socialists held quite a lot of informal meetings on their own。 Every now and then when they were giving their leaflets away； some unwary supporter of the capitalist system would start an argument； and soon a crowd would gather round and listen。
Sometimes the Socialists succeeded in arguing their opponents to an absolute standstill； for the Liberals and Tones found it impossible to deny that machinery is the cause of the overcrowded state of the labour market； that the overcrowded labour market is the cause of unemployment； that the fact of there being always an army of unemployed waiting to take other men's jobs away from them destroys the independence of those who are in employment and keeps them in subjection to their masters。 They found it impossible to deny that this machinery is being used； not for the benefit of all； but to make fortunes for a few。 In short； they were unable to disprove that the monopoly of the land and machinery by a comparatively few persons； is the cause of the poverty of the majority。 But when these arguments that they were unable to answer were put before them and when it was pointed out that the only possible remedy was the Public Ownership and Management of the Means of production； they remained angrily silent； having no alternative plan to suggest。
At other times the meeting resolved itself into a number of quarrelsome disputes between the Liberals and Tories that formed the crowd； which split itself up into a lot of little groups and whatever the original subject might have been they soon drifted to a hundred other things； for most of the supporters of the present system seemed incapable of pursuing any one subject to its logical conclusion。 A discussion would be started about something or other； presently an unimportant side issue would crop up； then the original subject would be left unfinished； and they would argue and shout about the side issue。 In a little while another side issue would arise； and then the first side issue would be abandoned also unfinished； and an angry wrangle about the second issue would ensue； the original subject being altogether forgotten。