友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
飞读中文网 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

an open letter on translating-第2章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!





document is concerned。 That is why I never intended to write in



opposition to it。 But I did have a laugh at the great wisdom that



so terribly slandered; condemned and forbade my New Testament;



when it was published under my name; but required its reading when



published under an other's name! What type of virtue is this that



slanders and heaps shame on someone else's work; and then steals



it; and publishes it under one's own name; thereby seeking glory



and esteem through the slandered work of someone else! I leave



that for his judge to say。 I am glad and satisfied that my work



(as St。 Paul also boasts ) is furthered by my enemies; and that



Luther's work; without Luther's name but that of his enemy; is to



be read。 What better vengeance?!







Returning to the issue at hand; if your Papist wishes to make a



great fuss about the word 〃alone〃 (sola); say this to him: 〃Dr。



Martin Luther will have it so and he says that a papist and an ass



are the same thing。〃 Sic volo; sic iubeo; sit pro ratione



voluntas。 (I will it; I command it; my will is reason enough) For



we are not going to become students and followers of the papists。



Rather we will become their judge and master。 We; too; are going



to be proud and brag with these blockheads; and just as St。 Paul



brags against his madly raving saints; I will brag over these



asses of mine! They are doctors? Me too。 They are scholars? I



am as well。 They are philosophers? And I。 They are



dialecticians? I am too。 They are lecturers? So am I。 They



write books? So do I。







I will go even further with my bragging: I can exegete the psalms



and the prophets; and they cannot。 I can translate; and they



cannot。 I can read Holy Scriptures; and they cannot。 I can pray;



they cannot。 Coming down to their level; I can do their



dialectics and philosophy better than all of them put together。



Plus I know that not one of them understands Aristotle。 If; in



fact; any one of them can correctly understand one part or chapter



of Aristotle; I will eat my hat! No; I am not overdoing it for I



have been educated in and have practiced their science since my



childhood。 I recognize how broad and deep it is。 They; too; know



that everything they can do; I can do。 Yet they handle me like a



stranger in their discipline; these incurable fellows; as if I had



just arrived this morning and had never seen or heard what they



know and teach。 How they do so brilliantly parade around with



their science; teaching me what I grew beyond twenty years ago!



To all their shouting and screaming I join the harlot in singing:



〃I have known for seven years that horseshoe nails are iron。〃







So this can be the answer to your first question。 Please do not



give these asses any other answer to their useless braying about



that word 〃sola〃 than simply 〃Luther will have it so; and he says



that he is a doctor above all the papal doctors。〃 Let it remain



at that。 I will; from now on; hold them in contempt; and have



already held them in contempt; as long as they are the kind of



people that they are … asses; I should say。 And there are brazen



idiots among them who have never learned their own art of



sophistry … like Dr。 Schmidt and Snot…Nose; and such like them。



They set themselves against me in this matter; which not only



transcends sophistry; but as St。 Paul writes; all the wisdom and



understanding in the world as well。 An ass truly does not have to



sing much as he is already known for his ears。







For you and our people; however; I shall show why I used the word



〃sola〃 … even though in Romans 3 it wasn't 〃sola〃 I used but



〃solum〃 or 〃tantum〃。 That is how closely those asses have looked



at my text! However; I have used 〃sola fides〃 in other places;



and I want to use both 〃solum〃 and 〃sola〃。 I have continually



tried translating in a pure and accurate German。 It has happened



that I have sometimes searched and inquired about a single word



for three or four weeks。 Sometimes I have not found it even then。



I have worked Meister Philip and Aurogallus so hard in translating



Job; sometimes barely translating 3 lines after four days。 Now



that it has been translated into German and completed; all can



read and criticize it。 One can now read three or four pages



without stumbling one time … without realizing just what rocks and



hindrances had once been where now one travels as as if over a



smoothly…cut plank。 We had to sweat and toil there before we



removed those rocks and hindrances; so one could go along nicely。



The plowing goes nicely in a clear field。 But nobody wants the



task of digging out the rocks and hindrances。 There is no such



thing as earning the world's thanks。 Even God cannot earn thanks;



not with the sun; nor with heaven and earth; or even the death of



his Son。 It just is and remains as it is; in the devil's name; as



it will not be anything else。







I also know that in Rom。 3; the word 〃solum〃 is not present in



either Greek or Latin text … the papists did not have to teach me



that … it is fact! The letters s…o…l…a are not there。 And these



knotheads stare at them like cows at a new gate; while at the same



time they do not recognize that it conveys the sense of the text …



if the translation is to be clear and accurate; it belongs there。



I wanted to speak German since it was German I had spoken in



translation … not Latin or Greek。 But it is the nature of our



language that in speaking about two things; one which is affirmed;



the other denied; we use the word 〃solum〃 only along with the word



〃not〃 (nicht) or 〃no〃 (kein)。 For example; we say 〃the farmer



brings only (allein) grain and no money〃; or 〃No; I really have no



money; but only (allein) grain〃; I have only eaten and not yet



drunk〃; 〃Did you write it only and not read it over?〃 There are a



vast number of such everyday cases。







In all these phrases; this is a German usage; even though it is



not the Latin or Greek usage。 It is the nature of the German



tongue to add 〃allein〃 in order that 〃nicht〃 or 〃kein〃 may be



clearer and more complete。 To be sure; I can also say 〃The farmer



brings grain and no (kein) money; but the words 〃kein money〃 do



not sound as full and clear as if I were to say; 〃the farmer



brings allein grain and kein money。〃 Here the word 〃allein〃 helps



the word 〃kein〃 so much that it becomes a clear and complete



German expression。







We do not have to ask about the literal Latin or how we are to



speak German … as these asses do。 Rather we must ask the mother



in the home; the children on the street; the common person in the



market about this。 We must be guided by their tongue; the manner



of their speech; and do our translating accordingly。 Then they



will understand it and recognize that we are speaking German to



them。







For instance; Christ says: E
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!