按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
you have been misinformed （replied the lieutenant）； in that
continent the Scots did nothing more than their duty； nor was
there one corps in his majesty's service that distinguished
itself more than another。 Those who affected to extol the Scots
for superior merit； were no friends to that nation。'
Though he himself made free with his countrymen； he would not
suffer any other person to glance a sarcasm at them with
impunity。 One of the company chancing to mention lord B's
inglorious peace； the lieutenant immediately took up the cudgels
in his lordship's favour； and argued very strenuously to prove
that it was the most honourable and advantageous peace that
England had ever made since the foundation of the monarchy。 Nay；
between friends； he offered such reasons on this subject； that I
was really confounded； if not convinced。 He would not allow that
the Scots abounded above their proportion in the army and navy of
Great…Britain； or that the English had any reason to say his
countrymen had met with extraordinary encouragement in the
service。 'When a South and North…Briton （said he） are competitors
for a place or commission； which is in the disposal of an English
minister or an English general； it would be absurd to suppose
that the preference will not be given to the native of England；
who has so many advantages over his rival。 First and foremost；
he has in his favour that laudable partiality； which； Mr Addison
says； never fails to cleave to the heart of an Englishman； secondly；
he has more powerful connexions； and a greater share of parliamentary
interest； by which those contests are generally decided； and
lastly； he has a greater command of money to smooth the way to
his success。 For my own part （said he）； I know no Scotch officer；
who has risen in the army above the rank of a subaltern； without
purchasing every degree of preferment either with money or
recruits； but I know many gentlemen of that country； who； for
want of money and interest； have grown grey in the rank of
lieutenants； whereas very few instances of this ill…fortune are
to be found among the natives of South…Britain。 Not that I would
insinuate that my countrymen have the least reason to complain。
Preferment in the service； like success in any other branch of
traffic； will naturally favour those who have the greatest stock
of cash and credit； merit and capacity being supposed equal on
all sides。'
But the most hardy of all this original's positions were these：
That commerce would； sooner or later； prove the ruin of every
nation； where it flourishes to any extent that the parliament
was the rotten part of the British constitution that the liberty
of the press was a national evil and that the boasted
institution of juries； as managed in England； was productive of
shameful perjury and flagrant injustice。 He observed； that
traffick was an enemy to all the liberal passions of the soul；
founded on the thirst of lucre； a sordid disposition to take
advantage of the necessities of our fellow creatures。 He
affirmed； the nature of commerce was such； that it could not be
fixed or perpetuated； but； having flowed to a certain height；
would immediately begin to ebb； and so continue till the
channels should be left almost dry； but there was no instance of
the tide's rising a second time to any considerable influx in the
same nation。 Mean while the sudden affluence occasioned by trade；
forced open all the sluices of luxury and overflowed the land
with every species of profligacy and corruption； a total pravity
of manners would ensue； and this must be attended with bankruptcy
and ruin。 He observed of the parliament； that the practice of
buying boroughs； and canvassing for votes； was an avowed system
of venality； already established on the ruins of principle；
integrity； faith； and good order； in consequence of which the
elected and the elector； and； in short； the whole body of the
people； were equally and universally contaminated and corrupted。
He affirmed； that of a parliament thus constituted； the crown
would always have influence enough to secure a great majority in
its dependence； from the great number of posts； places； and
pensions it had to bestow； that such a parliament would （as it
had already done） lengthen the term of its sitting and authority；
whenever the prince should think it for his interest to continue
the representatives； for； without doubt； they had the same right
to protect their authority ad infinitum； as they had to extend it
from three to seven years。 With a parliament； therefore；
dependent upon the crown； devoted to the prince； and supported by
a standing army； garbled and modelled for the purpose； any king
of England may； and probably some ambitious sovereign will；
totally overthrow all the bulwarks of the constitution； for it is
not to be supposed that a prince of high spirit will tamely
submit to be thwarted in all his measures； abused and insulted by
a populace of unbridled ferocity； when he has it in his power to
crush all opposition under his feet with the concurrence of the
legislature。 He said； he should always consider the liberty of
the press as a national evil； while it enabled the vilest reptile
to soil the lustre of the most shining merit； and furnished the
most infamous incendiary with the means of disturbing the peace
and destroying the good order of the community。 He owned；
however； that under due restrictions； it would be a valuable
privilege； but affirmed； that at present there was no law in
England sufficient to restrain it within proper bounds。
With respect to juries； he expressed himself to this effect：
juries are generally composed of illiterate plebeians； apt to be
mistaken； easily misled； and open to sinister influence； for if
either of the parties to be tried； can gain over one of the
twelve jurors； he has secured the verdict in his favour； the
juryman thus brought over will； in despight of all evidence and
conviction； generally hold out till his fellows are fatigued； and
harassed； and starved into concurrence； in which case the verdict
is unjust； and the jurors are all perjured： but cases will often
occur； when the jurors are really divided in opinion； and each
side is convinced in opposition to the other； but no verdict will
be received； unless they are unanimous； and they are all bound；
not only in conscience； but by oath； to judge and declare
according to their conviction。 What then will be the
consequence？ They must either starve in company； or one side
must sacrifice their conscience to their convenience； and join in
a verdict which they believe to be false。 This absurdity is
avoided in Sweden； where a bare majority is sufficient； and in
Scotland； where two thirds of the jury are required to concur in
the verdict。
You must not imagine that all these deductions were made on his
part； without contradictions on mine。 No the truth is； I found
myself piqued in point of honour； at his pretending to be so much
wiser than his neighbours。 I questioned all his assertions；
started innumerable objections； argued and wrangled with uncommon
perseverance； and grew very warm； and even violent； in the
debate。 Somet