友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
飞读中文网 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

history of the mackenzies-第104章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



。〃  Another authentic document having a most  important bearing on this question was recently discovered in the office of the Sheriff…Clerk of Tain。  It is a discharge by Patrick Smith of Braco;  dated and registered in the Commissary Books at Fortrose; on the 4th of  December; 1668; in which the parties are described as 〃Kenneth Erle of  Seafort; Lord Kintail; as principal; and John Mackenzie of Gruinyard;  designit in the obligatione vnder…wrytten his naturall brother; as  cautioner。〃  Further; George of Kildun married; first; Mary Skene;  daughter of Skene of Skene; in 1661。 This is proved by a charter to her of  her jointure lands of Kincardine; etc。 (see Particular Register of Sasines  Invss。; vol。 ix。 fol。 9)。  He married; secondly; Margaret; daughter of  Urquhart of Craighouse。  The absolute impossibility is at once obvious of George of Kildunwho only married his first wife in 1661having had a son; John Mackenzie of Gruinard; in a position to have obtained a charter in his favour of the lands of Little Gruinard; etc。; in 1669within eight  years of his reputed father's marriage to his first wifeand who was  himself designated in that charter as of 〃Meikle Gruinard;〃 while it is  proved by undoubted official documents that John of Gruinard's wife had  lands disponed to her as his wife in 1655; that is; six years before the  marriage of George of Kildun; John's alleged father。  And further; how  could John of Gruinard's second son; Kenneth; have married; as be is  known to have done; the widow of Kenneth Og; fourth  Earl  of Seaforth; who died  in  1701; if John; his father; had been the son by a second  marriage of George of Kildun; who married his first wife in 1661?  The  thing is absolutely impossible。

Kenneth Mor; third Earl of Seaforth; who; according to the  Gruinard Genealogy; was John of Gruinard's uncle; was born at Brahan  Castle in  1635。  In 1651 he is described as 〃a child〃 by a contemporary writer; who says that the Kintail people declined to rise with him in that  year during his father's absence on the Continent; because 〃he was but a  child; and his father; their master; was in life。〃 Colin; first Earl of  Seaforth; died in 1633; and the author of the Ancient MS。 says that 〃Earl George; being then the Laird of Kildun; married before his brother's death;  the Lord Forbes's daughter。〃 Thus; George of Kildun could not have been  born before 1636 or 1637 at the very earliest; and the date of his first  marriage; twenty…four years later; strongly corroborates this。  How then could he have had a married son; John Mackenzie of Gruinard; whose wife undoubtedly obtained lands in 1655; that is; when Kildun himself  was only 18 years of age; and when John; already designated of Gruinard;  was; in 1656; old enough to be cautioner for Kenneth; Earl of Seaforth?

Proof of the same conclusive character could be adduced to any extent;  but in face of the documents already quoted; it is obviously superfluous to  do so。

John Mackenzie; I。 of Gruinard; could not in the nature of things have been a son of the second George Mackenzie of Kildun。  He was; on the other hand; undoubtedly; the natural son of the first George; who  succeeded  his brother Colin as second Earl of Seaforth; and it necessarily  follows that his representatives can have no claim whatever to the  Chiefship of the Clan; or to the ancient honours of the family of Kintail and Seaforth。  We shall now proceed to show that these distinctions  belong to and are at present possessed by the male representative of


THE  MACKENZIES  OF  ALLANGRANGE。


HAVING disposed of the only two serious claims made to the Chiefship of the Clan in later times our next step is to show who the present Chief is。

To do this we must go back to Kenneth; created Lord Mackenzie of Kintail in 1609; for there is no male representative of any later head of the  House in existence; so far as can be ascertained; between that date and  this。  Lord Kenneth had seven sons

1。  Colin Ruadh or 〃the Red Earl;〃 his heir and successor; who died; in 1633; without surviving male issue。

2。  John Mackenzie of Lochslinn; who married Isabel; daughter of Alexander Mackenzie; V。 of Gairloch; and died in 1631; having been poisoned at Tam; without issue male。  His only daughter; Margaret; married Sir Norman Macleod; I。 of Bernera; with issue。

3。  Kenneth; who died unmarried。  Lord Kenneth; XII。 of Kintail; married secondly; Isabel; daughter  of Sir Gilbert Ogilvie of Powrie; with issue

4。  Alexander; who died unmarried。

5。  George; who succeeded his brother Colin; as second Earl of Seaforth; and whose line terminated in Lady Caroline Mackenzie; who died without issue in 1847; her father Kenneth; Baron Ardelve and Earl of Seaforth in the peerage of Ireland; the last male of his line; having died at  the Cape of Good Hope in 1781。

6。  Thomas Mackenzie of Pluscardine; whose male issue was  proved extinct at the Allangrange Service in 1829。

7。  SIMON  MACKENZIE; who; after the death of his brother  John; was designated of Lochslinn; and whose representative will be shown to be the present head and heir male of the ancient family of Kintail and Seaforth; and Chief of the Clan。  This SIMON married; first;  Elizabeth; daughter of the Rev。 Peter Bruce of Ferrar; D。D。; Principal of St。 Leonard's College; St。 Andrews; and son of Bruce of Fingask; by  Elizabeth; daughter of Alexander Wedderburn of Blackness; with issue  five sons and one daughter; Jane; who married Robert Douglas of  Katewell; in the parish of Kiltearn; Ross…shire; and secondly; Sir James  Grant of Moyness。

The eldest of Simon's five sons was the famous SIR  GEORGE  MACKENZIE of Rosehaugh; Lord Advocate for  Scotland; whose history is so well known that it would serve no good  purpose to give only such a brief account of it as could be given in the  space here available。 He wrote several works of admitted literary merit; his Institutes being to this day considered a standard legal authority。

He  left an autobiography in MS。 which was published by his widow in 1716。

The estate of Rosehaugh; where he always took up his residence while in  the Highlands; was; in his time; profusely covered with the Dog Rose; a  fact which first suggested to the famous lawyer the idea of designating  that property by the name of 〃Vallis Rosarum;〃 or Rosehaugh。  Sir George  married first; Elizabeth; daughter of John Dickson of Hartree; with issue(1) John; (2) Simon; (3) George; all of whom died young and unmarried;  (4) Agnes; who in 1705 married Sir James Stuart Mackenzie; first Earl of  Bute; with issue; whose descendants; now represented by the Earl of Wharncliffe; succeeded to his Ross…shire estates; but since sold by them; though still retaining the name and arms of the family。 (For the succession  see Retour of James Marquis of Bute; January; 1721); (5) Elizabeth; who  married; first; Sir Archibald Cockburn of Langton; with issue; and;  secondly; the Hon。 Sir James Mackenzie of Royston; Baronet; with issue  George (who married but died before his father; without male issue); and  two daughtersAnne; who married Sir William Dick of Prestonfield; and  Elizabeth; who married Sir John Stuart of Grandtully; with issue。

Sir George
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!