友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
飞读中文网 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

sophist-第3章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



you like you

may say that there are no tame animals; or that; if there are; man

is not among them; or you may say that man is a tame animal 

but is not

hunted…you shall decide which of these alternatives you prefer。

  Theaet。 I should say; Stranger; that man is a tame animal; and I

admit that he is hunted。

  Str。 Then let us divide the hunting of tame animals into two parts。

  Theaet。 How shall we make the division?

  Str。 Let us define piracy; man…stealing; tyranny; the 

whole military

art; by one name; as hunting with violence。

  Theaet。 Very good。

  Str。 But the art of the lawyer; of the popular orator; and the art

of conversation may be called in one word the art of persuasion。

  Theaet。 True。

  Str。 And of persuasion; there may be said to be two kinds?

  Theaet。 What are they?

  Str。 One is private; and the other public。

  Theaet。 Yes; each of them forms a class。

  Str。 And of private hunting; one sort receives hire; and the other

brings gifts。

  Theaet。 I do not understand you。

  Str。 You seem never to have observed the manner in which lovers

hunt。

  Theaet。 To what do you refer?

  Str。 I mean that they lavish gifts on those whom they hunt in

addition to other inducements。

  Theaet。 Most true。

  Str。 Let us admit this; then; to be the amatory art。

  Theaet。 Certainly。

  Str。 But that sort of hireling whose conversation is pleasing and

who baits his hook only with pleasure and exacts nothing but his

maintenance in return; we should all; if I am not mistaken; describe

as possessing flattery or an art of making things pleasant。

  Theaet。 Certainly。

  Str。 And that sort; which professes to form acquaintances only for

the sake of virtue; and demands a reward in the shape of 

money; may be

fairly called by another name?

  Theaet。 To be sure。

  Str。 And what is the name? Will you tell me?

  Theaet。 It is obvious enough; for I believe that we have

discovered the Sophist: which is; as I conceive; the proper name for

the class described。

  Str。 Then now; Theaetetus; his art may be traced as a branch of

the appropriative; acquisitive family…which hunts

animals;…living…land…tame animals; which hunts man;…privately…for

hire;…taking money in exchange…having the semblance of education;

and this is termed Sophistry; and is a hunt after young men of

wealth and rank…such is the conclusion。

  Theaet。 Just so。

  Str。 Let us take another branch of his genealogy; for he is a

professor of a great and many sided art; and if we look back at what

has preceded we see that he presents another aspect; besides that of

which we are speaking。

  Theaet。 In what respect?

  Str。 There were two sorts of acquisitive art; the one 

concerned with

hunting; the other with exchange。

  Theaet。 There were。

  Str。 And of the art of exchange there are two divisions; the one

of giving; and the other of selling。

  Theaet。 Let us assume that。

  Str。 Next; will suppose the art of selling to be divided into two

parts。

  Theaet。 How?

  Str。 There is one part which is distinguished as the sale 

of a man's

own productions; another; which is the exchange of the works of

others。

  Theaet。 Certainly。

  Str。 And is not that part of exchange which takes place in 

the city;

being about half of the whole; termed retailing?

  Theaet。 Yes。

  Str。 And that which exchanges the goods of one city for those of

another by selling and buying is the exchange of the merchant?

  Theaet。 To be sure。

  Str。 And you are aware that this exchange of the merchant is of

two kinds: it is partly concerned with food for the use of the body;

and partly with the food of the soul which is bartered and 

received in

exchange for money。

  Theaet。 What do you mean?

  Str。 You want to know what is the meaning of food for the soul;

the other kind you surely understand。

  Theaet。 Yes。

  Str。 Take music in general and painting and marionette playing and

many other things; which are purchased in one city; and carried away

and sold in another…wares of the soul which are hawked about either

for the sake of instruction or amusement;…may not he who takes them

about and sells them be quite as truly called a merchant as he who

sells meats and drinks?

  Theaet。 To be sure he may。

  Str。 And would you not call by the same name him who buys up

knowledge and goes about from city to city exchanging his wares for

money?

  Theaet。 Certainly I should。

  Str。 Of this merchandise of the soul; may not one part be fairly

termed the art of display? And there is another part which is

certainly not less ridiculous; but being a trade in learning must be

called by some name germane to the matter?

  Theaet。 Certainly。

  Str。 The latter should have two names;…one descriptive of the sale

of the knowledge of virtue; and the other of the sale of other kinds

of knowledge。

  Theaet。 Of course。

  Str。 The name of art…seller corresponds well enough to the latter;

but you must try and tell me the name of the other。

  Theaet。 He must be the Sophist; whom we are seeking; no other name

can possibly be right。

  Str。 No other; and so this trader in virtue again turns out to be

our friend the Sophist; whose art may now be traced from the art of

acquisition through exchange; trade; merchandise; to a merchandise

of the soul which is concerned with speech and the knowledge of

virtue。

  Theaet。 Quite true。

  Str。 And there may be a third reappearance of him;…for he may have

settled down in a city; and may fabricate as well as buy these same

wares; intending to live by selling them; and he would still 

be called

a Sophist?

  Theaet。 Certainly。

  Str。 Then that part of acquisitive art which exchanges; and of

exchange which either sells a man's own productions or retails those

of others; as the case may be; and in either way sells the knowledge

of virtue; you would again term Sophistry?

  Theaet。 I must; if I am to keep pace with the argument。

  Str。 Let us consider once more whether there may not be yet

another aspect of sophistry。

  Theaet。 What is it?

  Str。 In the acquisitive there was a subdivision of the combative

or fighting art。

  Theaet。 There was。

  Str。 Perhaps we had better divide it。

  Theaet。 What shall be the divisions?

  Str。 There shall be one division of the competitive; and another

of the pugnacious。

  Theaet。 Very good。

  Str。 That part of the pugnacious which is contest of 

bodily strength

may be properly called by some such name as violent。

  Theaet。 True。

  Str。 And when the war is one of words; it may be termed 

controversy?

  Theaet。 Yes。

  Str。 And controversy may be of two kinds。

  Theaet。 What are they?

  Str。 When long speeches are answered by long speeches; and there

is public discussion about the just and unjust; that is forensic

controversy。

  Theaet。 Yes。

  Str。 And there is a private sort of controversy; which is cut up

into questions and answers; and this is commonly called disputation?

  Theaet。 Yes; that is the name。

  Str。 And of disputation; that sort which is only a discussion

about contracts; and is carried on at r
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!