友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
飞读中文网 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

theologico-political treatise p4(神学与政治专题研究4)-第27章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!




rule that religion is comprised solely in the exercise of charity and justice; 

and   that   the   rights   of   rulers   in   sacred;   no   less   than   in   secular   matters; 

should   merely  have   to do   with   actions; but   that   every  man   should   think 

what he likes and say what he thinks。 

     (20:82) I have thus fulfilled the task I set myself in this treatise。 '20:5' 

(83) It remains only to call attention to the fact that I have written nothing 

which I do not most willingly submit to the examination and approval of 

my country's rulers; and that I am willing to retract anything which they 

shall decide to be repugnant to the laws; or prejudicial to the public good。 

(84) I know that I am a man; and as a man liable to error; but against error 

I have taken scrupulous care; and have striven to keep in entire accordance 

with the laws of my country; with loyalty; and with morality。 



                                               66 


… Page 67…

                              A Theologico…Political Treatise 



     End of Part 4 of 4。 



     AUTHOR'S ENDNOTES TO THE 

         THEOLOGICO…POLITICAL 

                              TREATISE 



     Chapter     XVI。 

     'Endnote   26'。   (1)   〃No   one   can   honestly   promise   to   forego   the   right 

which he has over all things。〃 (2) In the state of social life; where general 

right determines what is good or evil; stratagem is rightly distinguished as 

of two kinds; good and evil。 (3) But in the state of Nature; where every 

man is his own judge; possessing the absolute right to lay down laws for 

himself; to interpret them as he pleases; or to abrogate them if he thinks it 

convenient; it is not conceivable that stratagem should be evil。 

     'Endnote 27'。   (1)   〃Every   member   of   it   may;   if   he   will;   be   free。〃   (2) 

Whatever be the social state a man finds; himself in; he may be free。 (3) 

For certainly a man is free; in so far as he is led by reason。 (4) Now reason 

(though Hobbes thinks otherwise) is always on the side of peace;  which 

cannot   be   attained   unless   the   general   laws   of   the   state   be   respected。   (5) 

Therefore the more he is free; the more constantly will he respect the laws 

of his country; and obey the commands of the sovereign power to which 

he is subject。 

     'Endnote     28'。   (1)  〃No    one   knows    by   nature   that  he   owes    any 

obedience to God。〃 (2) When Paul says that men have in themselves no 

refuge; he speaks as a man: for in the ninth chapter of the same epistle he 

expressly teaches that God has mercy on whom He will; and that men are 

without   excuse;   only   because   they   are   in   God's   power   like   clay   in   the 

hands   of   a   potter;   who   out   of   the   same   lump   makes   vessels;   some   for 

honour and some for dishonour; not because they have been forewarned。 

(3) As regards the Divine natural law whereof the chief commandment is; 

as we have said; to love God; I have called it a law in the same sense; as 

philosophers style laws those general rules of nature; according to which 



                                           67 


… Page 68…

                                 A Theologico…Political Treatise 



everything happens。 (4) For the love of God is not a state of obedience: it 

is a virtue which necessarily exists in a man who knows God rightly。 (5) 

Obedience has regard to the will of a ruler; not to necessity and truth。 (6) 

Now as we are ignorant of the nature of God's will; and on the other hand 

know that everything happens solely by God's power; we cannot; except 

through revelation; know whether God wishes in any way to be honoured 

as a sovereign。 

     (7) Again;   we  have   shown that   the  Divine  rights   appear  to   us   in   the 

light of rights or commands; only so long as we are ignorant of their cause: 

as soon as their cause is known; they cease to be rights; and we embrace 

them no longer as rights but as eternal truths; in other words; obedience 

passes     into   love    of   God;    which     emanates      from    true   knowledge       as 

necessarily   as   light   emanates   from   the   sun。   (8)   Reason   then   leads   us   to 

love   God;   but   cannot   lead   us   to   obey   Him;   for   we   cannot   embrace   the 

commands   of   God   as   Divine;   while   we   are   in   ignorance   of   their   cause; 

neither can we rationally conceive God as a sovereign laying down laws as 

a sovereign。 

     Chapter      XVII。 

     'Endnote   29'。   (1)   〃If   men   could   lose   their  natural   rights   so   as   to   be 

absolutely unable  for  the  future  to   oppose  the  will   of the sovereign〃   (2) 

Two common soldiers undertook to change the Roman dominion; and did 

change it。 (Tacitus; Hist。 i:7。) 

     'Endnote 30'。 (1) See Numbers xi。 28。 In this passage it is written that 

two men prophesied in the camp; and that Joshua wished to punish them。 

(2)   This   he   would   not   have   done;   if   it   had   been   lawful   for   anyone   to 

deliver the Divine oracles to the people without the consent of Moses。 (3) 

But Moses thought good to pardon the two men; and rebuked Joshua for 

exhorting him to use his royal prerogative; at a time when he was so weary 

of   reigning;   that   he   preferred   death   to   holding   undivided   sway   (Numb。 

xi:14)。 (4) For he made answer to Joshua; 〃Enviest thou for my sake? (5) 

Would   God   that   all   the   Lord's   people   were   prophets;   and   that   the   Lord 

would put His   spirit upon them。〃   (6) That is   to say;  would   God that   the 

right of taking counsel  of   God   were   general;  and the   power   were   in   the 

hands of the people。 (7) Thus Joshua was not mistaken as to the right; but 



                                               68 


… Page 69…

                                A Theologico…Political Treatise 



only as to the time for using it; for which he was rebuked by Moses; in the 

same way as Abishai was rebuked by David for counselling that Shimei; 

who had undoubtedly been guilty of treason; should be put to death。 (8) 

See 2 Sam。 xix:22; 23。 

     'Endnote   31'。   (1)   See   Numbers   xxvii:21。   (2)   The   translators   of   the 

Bible have rendered incorrectly verses 19 and 23 of this chapter。 (3) The 

passage does not mean that Moses gave precepts or advice to Joshua; but 

that he made or established him chief of the Hebrews。 (4) The phrase is 

very freguent in Scripture (see Exodus; xviii:23; 1 Sam。 xiii:15; Joshua i:9; 

1 Sam。 xxv:80)。 

     'Endnote 32' (1) 〃There was no judge over each of the captains save 

God。〃 (2) The Rabbis and some Christians equally foolish pretend that the 

Sanhedrin; called 〃the great〃 was instituted by Moses。 (3) As a matter of 

fact; Moses chose seventy colleagues to assist him in governing; because 

he was not able to bear alone the burden of the whole pe
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!